2022
DOI: 10.36849/jdd.6737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine CaHA (+) for Soft Tissue Augmentation: Results from an Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of CaHA on aesthetic purposes can be explained through various reported mechanisms, including promoting cell proliferation, collagen production, angiogenesis, and the formation of elastic fibers and elastin [ 4 ]. The aesthetic effectiveness of CaHA has been investigated in several clinical trials and observational studies that report various degrees of improvement in aesthetic scales [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and levels of patient satisfaction [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. The majority of available studies reported a comparison between the aesthetic effects of CaHA following injection versus the baseline values [ 7 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], and there are limited comparative clinical data on efficacy of CaHA relative to other categories of existing fillers [ 5 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of CaHA on aesthetic purposes can be explained through various reported mechanisms, including promoting cell proliferation, collagen production, angiogenesis, and the formation of elastic fibers and elastin [ 4 ]. The aesthetic effectiveness of CaHA has been investigated in several clinical trials and observational studies that report various degrees of improvement in aesthetic scales [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and levels of patient satisfaction [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. The majority of available studies reported a comparison between the aesthetic effects of CaHA following injection versus the baseline values [ 7 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], and there are limited comparative clinical data on efficacy of CaHA relative to other categories of existing fillers [ 5 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aesthetic effectiveness of CaHA has been investigated in several clinical trials and observational studies that report various degrees of improvement in aesthetic scales [5][6][7][8][9] and levels of patient satisfaction [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The majority of available studies reported a comparison between the aesthetic effects of CaHA following injection versus the baseline values [7,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and there are limited comparative clinical data on efficacy of CaHA relative to other categories of existing fillers [5,[23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%