2013
DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2013/0025-2279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcite interaction with acidic sulphate solutions: a vertical scanning interferometry and energy-dispersive XRF study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) in scanned flat regions with similar initial roughness. The measured calcite dissolution rate, R AFM , was 1.45 × 10 −10 mol·cm −2 ·s −1 , which agrees with that at nearly neutral pH reported elsewhere [19,4243]. The etch pit expansion rate, R s , was measured to be 1.82 ± 0.12 nm·s −1 and falls within the range of those calculated for deionized water by Jordan and Rammensee (velocity of slow step 0.5 ± 0.2 nm/s and of fast steps 2.5 ± 0.5 nm/s) [44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1) in scanned flat regions with similar initial roughness. The measured calcite dissolution rate, R AFM , was 1.45 × 10 −10 mol·cm −2 ·s −1 , which agrees with that at nearly neutral pH reported elsewhere [19,4243]. The etch pit expansion rate, R s , was measured to be 1.82 ± 0.12 nm·s −1 and falls within the range of those calculated for deionized water by Jordan and Rammensee (velocity of slow step 0.5 ± 0.2 nm/s and of fast steps 2.5 ± 0.5 nm/s) [44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These have been calculated from height differences of profile lines over the reacted surface, but the criterion for choosing the location of those profiles was not given and might justify to some extent the difference. However, from what we saw here, the orientation and the size difference between our grains and the single crystals used in [53] might have played the most significant role.…”
Section: Relevance To Previous Research and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This method might underestimate the contribution of etch pits to the rates. Two orders of magnitude lower calcite dissolution rates are also found in literature [53]. These have been calculated from height differences of profile lines over the reacted surface, but the criterion for choosing the location of those profiles was not given and might justify to some extent the difference.…”
Section: Relevance To Previous Research and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most probable rates are shown in Table 3 and range from 0.13 µmol m −2 s −1 to 0.33 µmol m −2 s −1 . Atanassova et al (2013) proposed the following rate equation for calcite dissolution, based on an extensive dissolution dataset measured by VSI, Rfalse(normalμmol m2s1false)=false(3.3±1.8false)×104·false(aH+false)false(0.94±0.08false)goodbreak+false(0.25±0.08false)where a H + is the chemical activity of H + , assumed to be 10 −7 in pure flowing water. Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calcite (104) surface was chosen for this study primarily to enable comparisons to the many VSI and AFM examinations of dissolution of the same surface (Hillner et al, 1993; Dove and Platt, 1996; Lea et al, 2001; Arvidson et al, 2003; Duckworth and Martin, 2004; Bisschop et al, 2006; Harstad and Stipp, 2007; Vinson et al, 2007; Ruiz-Agudo et al, 2010; Xu et al, 2010; Fischer et al, 2012; Atanassova et al, 2013; Klasa et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2013; Ueta et al, 2013; Renard et al, 2015). As will be shown, the average or modal dissolution rates measured here fall comfortably within the range of values reported in those studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%