2012
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.111.966606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcified In-Stent Restenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our data, the appearance of calcified neointima was closely dependent on the time from the implantation, suggesting that it takes ≈6 years to develop a calcified neointima. Stent ages in the previous case reports were 8 and 10 years, 18,19 which were consistent with our data. In the native coronary artery, intimal calcification develops in the second decade of life, and the prevalence increases over time.…”
Section: Stent Age and Nasupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our data, the appearance of calcified neointima was closely dependent on the time from the implantation, suggesting that it takes ≈6 years to develop a calcified neointima. Stent ages in the previous case reports were 8 and 10 years, 18,19 which were consistent with our data. In the native coronary artery, intimal calcification develops in the second decade of life, and the prevalence increases over time.…”
Section: Stent Age and Nasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…7,9,10 In the present study, we identified 8 calcified neointima (4.5%) of 179 stents. Although 2 case reports with intravascular ultrasound and OCT have been published, 18,19 there has been no systematic study showing the presence and clinical significance of calcified neointima. In our data, the appearance of calcified neointima was closely dependent on the time from the implantation, suggesting that it takes ≈6 years to develop a calcified neointima.…”
Section: Stent Age and Namentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7, 8 We recently reported a patient with undilatable calcified ISR who experienced several episodes of balloon rupture despite the use of non-compliant balloons. 7 Eventually rotational atherectomy was required to dilate the calcified tissue causing ISR and to obtain an optimal final result. In that patient, the combined use of OCT and IVUS was instrumental in identifying the calcified tissue within the stent and to optimize final results.…”
Section: Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, when a new stent is implanted OCT is able to identify the presence of residual calcified tissue between the 2 stent layers. 7 OCT is of great value in detecting dissections at the stent edge (frequently angiographically silent), and recent data suggest that these dissections may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. 9-11 OCT may also identify intra-stent dissections but its value in visualizing abluminal dissections in patients presenting with ISR remains unclear.…”
Section: Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 99%