2020
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcareous defence structures of prey mediate the effects of predation and biotic resistance towards the tropics

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a loss in predator diversity may have contributed to the observed differences in community structure across treatments. Along with other studies (Dumont et al 2011; see also Dias et al 2020), the experiments mentioned above also demonstrated that an important predation on most of the non-indigenous and cryptogenic ascidians gave a competitive advantage to their native, dominant and less predated counterpart, namely Pyura chilensis, one of our habitat-builders. This effect, measured by percentage of cover reduction after 4 months in a settlement panel experiment, was, however, not consistently detected by the exclusion of macro-predators (Leclerc et al 2020a).…”
Section: Indirect Effect Of Physical Disturbance: Partially Releasing Incomers From Predationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Such a loss in predator diversity may have contributed to the observed differences in community structure across treatments. Along with other studies (Dumont et al 2011; see also Dias et al 2020), the experiments mentioned above also demonstrated that an important predation on most of the non-indigenous and cryptogenic ascidians gave a competitive advantage to their native, dominant and less predated counterpart, namely Pyura chilensis, one of our habitat-builders. This effect, measured by percentage of cover reduction after 4 months in a settlement panel experiment, was, however, not consistently detected by the exclusion of macro-predators (Leclerc et al 2020a).…”
Section: Indirect Effect Of Physical Disturbance: Partially Releasing Incomers From Predationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Furthermore, although prey taxonomic composition shifted in response to predation in the tropics, the effects of predators on individual prey taxa will likely depend on prey functional traits, such as those related to defense and palatability (Sheppard-Brennand et al 2017, L opez and. Functional groups of prey can vary systematically in these traits, rendering some groups more susceptible to predation than others (L. J. Jurgens, A. L. Freestone, G. M. Ruiz et al, unpublished data, Lavender et al 2017, Dias et al 2020. Indeed, some prey functional groups (e.g., solitary tunicates) can be consumed to the point of exclusion in these communities in the tropics (Freestone et al 2013, highlighting the potential for trait-specific impacts on prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evidence continues to accrue in support of the prediction that predation intensity is stronger at lower latitudes (e.g., Schemske et al 2009, Roslin et al 2017, Reynolds et al 2018, debate on its generality persists (Roesti et al 2020). Further, variation in predation strength across latitude likely has important ecological consequences for prey communities, yet studies that document such community-scale effects, or impacts of predation, are rare (but see , Lavender et al 2017, Dias et al 2020, Freestone et al 2020. Testing the prediction that both predation intensity and impacts on prey communities are greater at lower latitudes requires standardized experiments and observations on multiple components of a system across continental scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These communities are usually dominated by colonial organisms that can monopolize space through asexual reproduction in a variable way, some of them being able to prevent the colonization of other species (Jackson 1977;Hiebert et al 2019). Additionally, they are fast growing, easy to manipulate and provide clear results regarding the effect of interactions in a short time span (Osman and Whitlatch 2004;Freestone et al 2011;Vieira et al 2018a, b;Dias et al 2020), which make them ideal for experiments testing the effect of founder identity and predation on community structure and diversity. Predation is one of the strongest forces shaping such communities in the area, affecting both richness and structure throughout community development (Vieira et al 2012(Vieira et al , 2016Oricchio et al 2016a, b;Dias et al 2020).…”
Section: Study Site and Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we conducted an experiment simulating different colonization scenarios, and controlling the access of predators, to test how consumptive effects are modulated by the identity of founders and their functional traits. Marine fouling species were used as models, as they are functionally diverse, fast-growing, and easily manipulated (Dean and Hurd 1980;Osman and Whitlatch 2004;Freestone et al 2011;Vieira et al 2018a, b;Dias et al 2020). Founder functional identity was determined by starting communities with species of four different groups, colonial and solitary ascidians, and arborescent and flat-encrusting bryozoans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%