2019
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAGI 5 splicing challenge: Improved exon skipping and intron retention predictions with MMSplice

Abstract: Pathogenic genetic variants often primarily affect splicing. However, it remains difficult to quantitatively predict whether and how genetic variants affect splicing. In 2018, the fifth edition of the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation proposed two splicing prediction challenges based on experimental perturbation assays: Vex‐seq, assessing exon skipping, and MaPSy, assessing splicing efficiency. We developed a modular modeling framework, MMSplice, the performance of which was among the best on both c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, CAGI has had just one small splicing challenge [https://genomeinterpretation.org/content/Splicing-2012]. CAGI5 included two full‐scale splicing challenges (Mount et al, ) and these have resulted in five papers from participants (Chen, Lu, Zhao, & Yang, ; Cheng, Çelik, Nguyen, Avsec, & Gagneur, ; Gotea, Margolin, & Elnitski, ; Naito, ; Wang, Wang, & Hu, ). The issue also contains an overview paper from one of the splicing data providers (Rhine et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, CAGI has had just one small splicing challenge [https://genomeinterpretation.org/content/Splicing-2012]. CAGI5 included two full‐scale splicing challenges (Mount et al, ) and these have resulted in five papers from participants (Chen, Lu, Zhao, & Yang, ; Cheng, Çelik, Nguyen, Avsec, & Gagneur, ; Gotea, Margolin, & Elnitski, ; Naito, ; Wang, Wang, & Hu, ). The issue also contains an overview paper from one of the splicing data providers (Rhine et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SpliceAI is a splice junction prediction model shown to outperform other models such as GeneSplicer [ 25 ] and NNSplice [ 26 ]. MMSplice is a model of exon skipping ranked first at the recent fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation group [ 27 , 28 ], shown to outperform state-of-the-art models such as COSSMO [ 20 ], HAL [ 19 ], SPANR [ 18 ], and MaxEntScan [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many computational tools have been developed to predict splice sites or splicing strength from sequence [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. However, tools are lacking for predicting tissuespecific effects of human genetic variants on splicing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously developed MMSplice, a neural network with a modular design that predicts the effect of variants on splicing [29,30]. Unlike SPANR, which has been trained on natural endogenous genomic sequence, MMSplice leverages perturbation data from a recently published massively parallel reporter assay [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%