2019
DOI: 10.3390/nu11020440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caffeine Supplementation and Physical Performance, Muscle Damage and Perception of Fatigue in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Soccer is a complex team sport and success in this discipline depends on different factors such as physical fitness, player technique and team tactics, among others. In the last few years, several studies have described the impact of caffeine intake on soccer physical performance, but the results of these investigations have not been properly reviewed and summarized. The main objective of this review was to evaluate critically the effectiveness of a moderate dose of caffeine on soccer physical performance. A s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
79
2
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
79
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As recently identified, caffeine supplementation may have a "responder" vs. "non-responder" nature, which limits the translation to "non-responder" populations [33]. The current investigation found a significant learning effect; however, it is possible that participants 2, 3,8,9,10,11,12,15,17,18,19, and 20 may have been "non-responders" to caffeine supplementation (see Table 1). The inter-individual differences in the ergogenicity of caffeine are thought to be related to genetic polymorphisms associated with the CYP1A2 and ADORA2A genes, which discern fast and slow caffeine metabolism/clearance [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As recently identified, caffeine supplementation may have a "responder" vs. "non-responder" nature, which limits the translation to "non-responder" populations [33]. The current investigation found a significant learning effect; however, it is possible that participants 2, 3,8,9,10,11,12,15,17,18,19, and 20 may have been "non-responders" to caffeine supplementation (see Table 1). The inter-individual differences in the ergogenicity of caffeine are thought to be related to genetic polymorphisms associated with the CYP1A2 and ADORA2A genes, which discern fast and slow caffeine metabolism/clearance [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although 20 CrossFit ® -trained men completed the study, the sample size is reasonably small. However, the average sample size reported in a recently published systematic review on the effects of caffeine in trained soccer players was 15 participants; therefore, the current investigation reflects similar sample sizes compared to other studies regarding caffeine's ergogenic effect in trained populations [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations