2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1620-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caffeinated chewing gum increases repeated sprint performance and augments increases in testosterone in competitive cyclists

Abstract: This investigation reports the effects of caffeinated chewing gum on fatigue and hormone response during repeated sprint performance with competitive cyclists. Nine male cyclists (mean ± SD, age 24 ± 7 years, VO(2max) 62.5 ± 5.4 mL kg(-1) min(-1)) completed four high-intensity experimental sessions, consisting of four sets of 30 s sprints (5 sprints each set). Caffeine (240 mg) or placebo was administered via chewing gum following the second set of each experimental session. Testosterone and cortisol concentra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(42 reference statements)
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stuart et al (2005) employed the work to rest ratio (1:4.5) to a rugby game simulation, with the rugby players performing seven circuits in 2 9 40-min with a 10-min rest interval at half-time; the results revealed that caffeine significantly improved the sprint speed/power in the first half, but reduced the sprint power in the second half. Furthermore, Paton et al (2010) reported that cyclists completed a set of 5 9 30 s with 30-s recovery intervals (work:rest ratio = 1: 1); the data show reduced fatigue in the caffeine trial, but no improvement in repeated sprint performance. Based on these findings, it is likely that the work and recovery duration play a crucial role in caffeine's ergogenic effects on intermittent sprint performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Stuart et al (2005) employed the work to rest ratio (1:4.5) to a rugby game simulation, with the rugby players performing seven circuits in 2 9 40-min with a 10-min rest interval at half-time; the results revealed that caffeine significantly improved the sprint speed/power in the first half, but reduced the sprint power in the second half. Furthermore, Paton et al (2010) reported that cyclists completed a set of 5 9 30 s with 30-s recovery intervals (work:rest ratio = 1: 1); the data show reduced fatigue in the caffeine trial, but no improvement in repeated sprint performance. Based on these findings, it is likely that the work and recovery duration play a crucial role in caffeine's ergogenic effects on intermittent sprint performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, high doses frequently elicit side effects including anxiety and tremor, and this vehicle of caffeine intake is typically impractical to the athlete that typically does not have access to pure caffeine. In this case, use of caffeine-containing energy drinks or chewing gum containing lower doses of caffeine (1-3 mg/kg body weight) is more practical due to their availability, minimal side effects, and low cost (Paton et al 2010). In fact, over 40% of young, elite British athletes reported energy drinks as the most widely used supplement (Petroczi et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, it is possible that caffeinated gum may prove beneficial in sporting events where athletes wish to mitigate the effects of accumulated fatigue and provide a rapid increase in performance such as at half-time during a football match or when preparing for a sprint finish in an endurance event. Indeed, a study by Paton, Lowe, and Irvine (2010), has reported that chewing caffeinated gum (~3 mg · kg −1 ) allowed trained cyclists to rapidly offset fatigue and maintain exercise intensity during multiple repeated efforts of highintensity sprint activity. Similarly, caffeinated chewing gum has also been shown to enhance longer duration steady state endurance performance with trained cyclists when administered just 5 min immediately prior to exercise (Ryan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%