Abstract-Resistanceto the lethal action of Cd2+ produced in mice was maintained for 6 to 24 hr after pretreatment with 1/10 of the challenge Cd2+ doses as shown by an increased oral LD50. Pretreatment 24 hr prior to the challenge doses was most effective. In addition, 1/20 to 1/7 of the challenge doses was necessary to acquire the tolerance to the acute oral toxicity of Cd2+. The largest effect was found for pretreatment with 1/7 of the challenge doses. Acute liver injury at 24 hr after challenge with a large dose of Cd2+ (100 mg Cd2+/kg, p.o.) was markedly reduced by pretreatment with a small dose of the cation (15 mg Cd2+/kg, p.o.) 24 or 48 hr prior to the challenge dose as shown by a marked reduction in serum GOT and GPT activities and the reversal of histopathological changes. The elevated serum urea nitrogen at 4 hr after the Cd2+ challenge was reduced by pretreatment 6 to 24 hr prior to the challenge dose. In spite of the increased urea nitrogen 4 hr after the Cd2+ challenge, no morphological alterations were observed in the kidney at 24 hr. Serum Alp activity was not significantly influenced by the Cd2+ challenge. Glucose in serum was increased by the administration of a small dose of Cd2+, but was unaffected by a large dose. Decreases in hepatic RNA and DNA concentrations at 24 hr after the Cd2+ challenge were prevented by pretreatment 24 or 48 hr prior to the challenge dose. Potentiation of hexobarbital sleep time was observed at 6 or 24 hr after a small dose of Cd2+. Nevertheless, further potentiation at 24 hr after the Cd2+ challenge (75 mg Cd2+/kg, p.o., in this case) was reduced by pretreatment 24 hr prior to the challenge dose. A major target organ for the acute oral toxicity of Cd2+ was the liver rather than the kidney.Pretreatment of animals with small doses of certain metals protects against subsequent toxic doses of the same metals (1-5). It has been proposed that protection by Cd2+ pretreatment against a lethal dose of the cation is due to the induction of metallothionein (MT) synthesis (4, 6-8). However, Webb and Verschoyle (3) have suggested that pre-induced MT may not be the only factor giving protection against the toxic action of Cd2+. As these investigations (2-8) were performed by parenteral administration of the test metal, the interaction of the metal with intestinal tissue was not studied.In my preliminary study (unpublished data), oral LD50 values for cadmium chloride, cupric chloride, ferrous sulfate, ferric chloride, mercuric chloride, manganese chloride, lead nitrate and zinc sulfate were determined in female ICR mice pretreated orally with single small doses (1/10 of the challenge doses) of the same cations or with deionized water 24 hr prior to the challenge doses. Among the eight metal salts tested, Cd2+ pretreatment gave the most effective protection against the acute oral toxicity of the same cation as evidenced by an increased LD50. Therefore, the present study was designed with oral administration of Cd2+ to mice to examine the effects of time intervals between