Cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic in animal feed and feed materials – trend analysis of monitoring results

Adamse, P.; Fels-Klerx, H J Ine Van der; Jong, J. de

doi:10.1080/19440049.2017.1300686

Cited by 104 publications

(63 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, feed samples did not represent any apparent risk for the intensive swine and cattle production systems (Supplementary Table 1). These results are in line with other studies (Mendoza-Huaitalla et al 2010;Zhang et al 2012;Wang et al 2013;Adamse et al 2017).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Hms and Minerals In Feed Faecal And Water Samsupporting

confidence: 93%

Evaluation of concentration of heavy metals in animal rearing system

Hejna

Moscatelli

Onelli

et al. 2019

Italian Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animal manure is one of the diffusion routes of heavy metals and metalloids into the environment, where the soil can accumulate them. Heavy metals and metalloids can then be released into groundwater sources, be absorbed by crops, and enter the food chain with negative effects for human and animal health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentration of heavy metals and mineral nutrients from modern animal rearing systems in order to develop effective strategies to increase the sustainability. Samples of feed (n ¼ 24: n ¼ 16 from swine, n ¼ 8 from cattle), faeces (n ¼ 120: n ¼ 80 from swine, n ¼ 40 from cattle) and water (n ¼ 8), were collected from eight typical intensive swine and cattle farms located in northern Italy. All samples were analysed for the humidity and the principal components. The samples were also dried, mineralised, and analysed by ICP-MS to detect the following elements: Na,

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Of Hms and Minerals In Feed Faecal And Water Samsupporting

confidence: 93%

Evaluation of concentration of heavy metals in animal rearing system

Hejna

Moscatelli

Onelli

et al. 2019

Italian Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Part of this report has been published in Food Additives & Contaminants (Adamse et al, 2017). The annexes present additional and more detailed results (tables and figures) of contamination of feeds and feed ingredients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in animal feed and feed materials : Trend analysis of monitoring result collected in the Netherlands

Adamse

Fels‐Klerx²,

Jong³

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trend analysis of monitoring results collected in the NetherlandsArsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in animal feed and feed materials Adamse, P., H.J. Van der Fels-Klerx, J. de Jong, 2017. Arsenic, lead, cadmium and Based on the results, monitoring for arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury should focus on feed material of mineral origin, feed material of marine origin, especially fish meal, seaweed and algae, and feed additives belonging to the functional groups of (1) The aim of the current study was to gain insight into the contamination of feed materials and compound feed used in the Netherlands with arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury. The emphasis is on compliance with the maximum limits (MLs) set in the European Union, on background concentrations and on possible trends over time. The results can be used to define priorities for national monitoring plans.Part of this report has been published in Food Additives & Contaminants (Adamse et al, 2017 However, the monitoring programmes do have a risk-based design to some extent. In most samples all four elements were analysed at the same time. The analysis of mercury, cadmium, arsenic and lead concentrations in the samples was performed as described in Adamse et al (2009) using validated and accredited methods (Table 1). Data from RASFF were used for comparison. These data, covering the same time period, were subtracted from the RASFF portal with search criteria product type "feed" and hazard category "heavy metals" (RASFF, 2014). The RASFF data include all notifications from the EU.Usually, the feed materials that are notified in RASFF are also used in the Netherlands. This means that the warnings from other European countries are relevant for the Dutch situation as well. This will be addressed where applicable. Interpreting the resultsThe monitoring results were studied per contaminant and feed material product (sub)group. Each contaminant/product(sub)group combination was studied in detail with separate trend analyses using the average, median, P90 or % > ML. The result of those analyses are summarised in separate tables for each contaminant. Results are evaluated and colours in the trend tables are added to indicate the level of priority this feed of feed material should have in the national monitoring plan. The priority was considered high (I) when two or more of the following criteria were fulfilled: average concentration higher than 20% of ML, more than 3% of the samples exceeded the ML, a significant increase of the average concentration between 2007 and 2013, and/or more than five RASFF notifications (from all of Europe). The priority was also considered high when 10% or more of the samples exceeded the ML.The priority was considered medium (II) when only one of the criteria was fulfilled. With low priority (III) none of the criteria was fulfilled.10 | RIKILT report 2017.006 3 Results and discussionIn general the percentage of samples of all feeds and feed materials that exceed the ML was low for each of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury, and did not inc...

show abstract

“…Lead content in feed and plants is largely due to atmospheric deposition of lead in soil. Majority of plants are capable of taking lead from soil through their roots [17].Current values of lead in both areas feed samples were lower than those reported by [18,19].…”

Section: Lead (Pb)mentioning

confidence: 90%

Assessment of metals concentrations in dairy feed collected from urban and rural areas dairy farms

Ghanghro¹

2020

PAB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citation Abdul Waheed Ghanghro. Assessment of metals concentrations in dairy feed collected from urban and rural areas dairy farms. AbstractMetals contamination in animal feed is one of the major issues for animal's health and performance because these toxic metals may accumulate in various organs of animal. The present study was aimed to determine the various concentrations of selected metals copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn) and Nickel (Ni) in 60 dairy feed samples collected from urban and rural areas of District Jamshoro Sindh by applying atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Significantly higher levels of Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Mn and Ni were obtained in dairy feeds collected from urban areas of Jamshoro. Mean levels of metals in dairy feeds were in the order of Zn>Cu>Pb>Cd>Mn>Ni and Zn>Cu>Cd>Ni>Pb>Mn in both areas. Significantly negative association for Zn-Cd (r=-o.463), Zn-Mn (r=-0.349) and Zn-Cd (r=-0.361) and Zn-Ni (r=-0.377) positive association for Cd-Mn (r=0.307) and Mn-Ni (r= 0.22) were found in between the concentrations of metals in both areas dairy feed samples. In cluster analysis (CA) metals were grouped in three main clusters indicating their same source of origin.

show abstract

Cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic in animal feed and feed materials – trend analysis of monitoring results

Cited by 104 publications

References 11 publications

Evaluation of concentration of heavy metals in animal rearing system

Evaluation of concentration of heavy metals in animal rearing system

Arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in animal feed and feed materials : Trend analysis of monitoring result collected in the Netherlands

Assessment of metals concentrations in dairy feed collected from urban and rural areas dairy farms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About