The intracellular compartmentation of essential and toxic metals is of intense scientific interest because of its potential for adding to our understanding of both normal homeostatic mechanisms for metals and of the mechanisms which underlie metal-induced cell injury. High-affinity metal-binding proteins, lysosomes, and precipitates such as inclusion bodies or concretions, play major roles in the regulation of divalent-metal cation bioavailability. The contribution of a given compartment toward metal homeostasis is dependent upon the level exposure, cell type, organ, species, and life cycle of the organism. Toxic metals may move between these compartments, but the rates and determinants of such exchanges have not been characterized. Available data clearly indicate that sequestration of toxic metals in these specialized compartments can produce profound disturbances in the subcellular handling of essential metals. Further studies of the mechanisms by which metals partition and/or transfer among these compartments are essential to understand and predict toxicity of this important class of toxic agents.Recent studies from a number of laboratories have identified several subcellular compartments as being major "sinks" for both essential and toxic metals in mammals and aquatic organisms. High-affinity metalbinding proteins (1-7), lysosomes (8-12), and precipitates such as inclusion bodies (13-19) or mineral concretions (7,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) all play important roles in intracellular metal homeostasis. The extent to which any one of these compartments is involved in metal binding appears to depend upon a number of factors, including dosing regimen for the metal administered, interactions with competing metals, cell type, organ, species, and life cycle. In addition, there appears to be movement of metals between these compartments, but the rates of metal exchange have not been determined. This review will focus on current knowledge of metal handling by these compartments, and the relationships that appear to exist between intracellular metal binding and toxicity in both mammals and nonmammalian aquatic species. This discussion will also attempt to suggest some needed areas for future research.It is hoped that this examination will illustrate the scientific potential of the comparative approach to provide a better understanding of mechanisms of metalinduced cell injury. In particular, attention will be focused on the relationships that must exist between intracellular compartmentation of metals and their bio- logical activity since this area appears to be of central importance to understanding mechanisms of injury under chronic exposure conditions.
Metal-Binding ProteinsIn recent years, extensive attention has been focused on the roles of soluble metal-binding proteins in the biological acitivity of both essential and toxic metals in mammalian (1-6,10,11) and nonmammalian (6,(28)(29)(30) organisms. While a majority of these proteins appear to share similarities with mammalian metallothionein (2,31), others ...