2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-007-9420-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadherins are regulated by Ep-CAM via phosphaditylinositol-3 kinase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, although the exact function of Ep-CAM is still unknown, recent insights have revealed a more versatile role for Ep-CAM that is not limited only to cell adhesion but includes diverse processes such as signaling, cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. 16,17 Taken all together, these observations suggest that targeting the high expression of Ep-CAM, as found in our study, on the surface of chemotherapy-resistant ovarian tumors, may be a novel, potentially effective option to attack residual/resistant disease after standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This hypothesis may be now easily tested because fully human antiYEp-CAM antibody (MT201, adecatumumab) has been developed and characterized 11 and are currently being tested in phase 2 clinical trials in breast and prostate cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, although the exact function of Ep-CAM is still unknown, recent insights have revealed a more versatile role for Ep-CAM that is not limited only to cell adhesion but includes diverse processes such as signaling, cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. 16,17 Taken all together, these observations suggest that targeting the high expression of Ep-CAM, as found in our study, on the surface of chemotherapy-resistant ovarian tumors, may be a novel, potentially effective option to attack residual/resistant disease after standard adjuvant chemotherapy. This hypothesis may be now easily tested because fully human antiYEp-CAM antibody (MT201, adecatumumab) has been developed and characterized 11 and are currently being tested in phase 2 clinical trials in breast and prostate cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Presumably, these cells loose expression under artificial in vitro conditions and loss of normal tissue polarity, since in vivo both basal/progenitor as well as differentiated luminal cells are strongly positive for immunoreactive EpCAM. Moreover, cell-cell adhesions in our HMECs are primarily mediated by E-cadherin, which has been described to be a counter player of EpCAM [10,18,31]. Typically, HMEC cultures age under mitotic stress and induce p16 INK4A and/or p53 [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a murine fibroblast model, Winter et al [126] subsequently demonstrated that this may occur by disruption of the link between a-catenin and F-actin, probably by EpCAM's disruption of the actin cytoskeleton or possibly via p120. In later work, on human breast epithelial cells, Winter et al [127] demonstrated that EpCAM cross-signalling with N-cadherin resulted in the abrogation of cadherin adhesion complexes, mediated by PI(3)K. In breast cancer cell lines, Martowicz et al [128] showed that epithelial cells need EpCAM to promote growth and invasion, yet mesenchymal tumour cells are independent of EpCAM for invasion and progression; Martowicz et al [129] also demonstrated that overexpression of EpCAM in human mammary epithelial cells led to a more proliferative phenotype and downregulation of E-cadherin. There is likely considerable plasticity in these pathways [110], with cells reverting to a less aggressive state by mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) or by the reversal of the CSC phenotype, and most likely influenced by the tumour microenvironment [23].…”
Section: Cadherins and Epcammentioning
confidence: 99%