2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cadaveric Study of the Safety and Device Functionality of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods After Exposure to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: Level V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each intact cadaveric pelvis was thawed to room temperature before undergoing pre and postoperative MRI and CT imaging of the pelvis, from the iliac crest to midfemoral diaphysis. 43,44 All MRIs were performed on a 1.5 T MAGNETOM Espree system (Siemens Healthcare) using an MRI sequence previously described 25 with the following modifications: field of view = 540 × 288 mm, total scan time = 9 min and 11 s, resulting in 144 axial slices. The previously described sequence has been shown to provide CT-like images from MRI to be used for bone segmentation.…”
Section: Imaging and Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each intact cadaveric pelvis was thawed to room temperature before undergoing pre and postoperative MRI and CT imaging of the pelvis, from the iliac crest to midfemoral diaphysis. 43,44 All MRIs were performed on a 1.5 T MAGNETOM Espree system (Siemens Healthcare) using an MRI sequence previously described 25 with the following modifications: field of view = 540 × 288 mm, total scan time = 9 min and 11 s, resulting in 144 axial slices. The previously described sequence has been shown to provide CT-like images from MRI to be used for bone segmentation.…”
Section: Imaging and Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference seems also clinically relevant in revision cases where TGRs should be given a priority (23). TGRs are also indicated in patients who need repeated MR images for medical followup, as MCGR prevents high quality MR images of the of spinal cord and perivertebral structures (38). Such follow-up might be needed, e.g., in the follow-up of children with neurofibromatosis.…”
Section: Comparison Of Traditional and Mcgrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a known limitation of this technique is the resulting diminished visualization when imaging the postoperative spine. The ferromagnetic actuators within MCGRs induce circumferential artifact measuring nearly 30 cm from the magnets, with the greatest amount when dual MCGRs are implanted in a standard, offset configuration 28 . Accordingly, there was agreement that MCGRs are not recommended in children with NF1 who have a known spinal tumor burden that requires ongoing routine MRI surveillance, particularly in the setting of known intraspinal tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ferromagnetic actuators within MCGRs induce circumferential artifact measuring nearly 30 cm from the magnets, with the greatest amount when dual MCGRs are implanted in a standard, offset configuration. 28 Accordingly, there was agreement that MCGRs are not recommended in children with NF1 who have a known spinal tumor burden that requires ongoing routine MRI surveillance, particularly in the setting of known intraspinal tumors. For these patients, alternative constructs should be utilized, such as traditional growing rods or a single MCGR with the magnet placed at the caudal end to limit MRI artifact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%