2023
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAD4TB software updates: different triaging thresholds require caution by users and regulation by authorities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, we have demonstrated the need for context-specific threshold determination, supporting recent calls for regulation of companies to provide guidance for effective adoption of CAD with appropriate oversight by WHO [ 30 , 42 ]. In our setting, a CAD4TBv7 threshold of 13 was close to WHO target product profile criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In conclusion, we have demonstrated the need for context-specific threshold determination, supporting recent calls for regulation of companies to provide guidance for effective adoption of CAD with appropriate oversight by WHO [ 30 , 42 ]. In our setting, a CAD4TBv7 threshold of 13 was close to WHO target product profile criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the study population was very different, being people who presented or were referred to tuberculosis screening centres in Bangladesh with 98% having symptoms. In the second, a community-based study in South Africa restricted to participants with sputum test results, a threshold of 20 was estimated (to most closely match radiologist sensitivity of 81%, with specificity 57%) [ 42 ]. This highlights the importance of threshold determination needing to be context specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dangers of changes in thresholds with version updates have also been pointed in the recent literature. 15 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any participant who answered yes to any of the WHO-4SS questions, who had a chest x-ray score ≥ 25 (CAD4TBv5), who had abnormal lung fields (as determined by the radiologist), or who was unable to undergo chest x-ray was offered sputum collection. A CAD4TB score reflects the degree of abnormality and likelihood of TB, but there is no universally accepted CAD4TBv5 score to use in a TB screening setting [ 13 ]. In a process previously detailed by Fehr et al [ 14 ], a CAD4TBv5 score of 25 threshold was selected to maximize TB case-finding in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%