2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00015-010-0024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAD assessment of the posture and range of motion of Kentrosaurus aethiopicus Hennig 1915

Abstract: A computer aided design analysis using highresolution laser scans of the bones of the stegosaur Kentrosaurus aethiopicus HENNIG 1915 from the Late Jurassic Tendaguru Formation indicates that in the habitual walking pose the forelimbs were probably held erect, and that strong humeral flexion and abduction mainly occurred in a defensive stance. Rapid gaits with unsupported phases could not be used. The neck allowed sufficient lateral flexion to guarantee good sight in all directions including posteriorly. The ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except in rare cases (e.g., [24], [25]), cartilage is not preserved in fossils, and we are unaware of any preserved articular cartilage in sauropod vertebrae. When we speak of fossil vertebrae in this paper, we are referring only to fossilised bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except in rare cases (e.g., [24], [25]), cartilage is not preserved in fossils, and we are unaware of any preserved articular cartilage in sauropod vertebrae. When we speak of fossil vertebrae in this paper, we are referring only to fossilised bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The shape of articular bony surfaces cannot therefore be assumed to indicate the functional shape of those surfaces in life. This is probably true of tetrapods in general but it is particularly important for large non-avian dinosaurs, in which extensive cartilage was present at many joints and did not always reflect the morphology of the underlying bones ([25], [27], [28] but see also [29]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories include the use of dorsal plates for display (Carpenter 1998;Main et al 2005;Hayashi et al 2009), thermoregulation (Farlow et al 1976Buffrénil et al 1986;Farlow et al 2010) and defence (Marsh 1877;Gilmore 1914;Bakker 1986, Mallison 2010. The fact that the plates had a keratinous covering has implications on all these hypotheses, and must therefore be considered when evaluating these suggestions.…”
Section: The Function Of the Dorsal Plates In Stegosauriansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maidment et al (2008) regarded S. armatus as a species showing a wide range of variation postcranially. However, this is not supported by the variation within the next bestrepresented stegosaurian species, Kentrosaurus aethiopicus HENNIG 1915 from the Tendaguru Formation (Late Jurassic) of Tanzania (Hennig 1915(Hennig , 1925Galton 1982;Mallison 2010). Maidment et al (2008) regarded most of the valid species from the Morrison Formation as junior synonyms of Stegosaurus armatus MARSH 1877, with 11 of the 12 characters based on referred specimens, not the holotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%