2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1515-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cactus thorn detection using bedside ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For one, the mitts would not be sufficient to retrieve a deeply embedded glochidia or spine. For these, ultrasound-guided removal using tweezers is a well-documented approach [4]. OR mitt removal would not be ideal for addressing injuries caused by cacti with larger spines; these injuries also tend to be amenable to tweezer removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, the mitts would not be sufficient to retrieve a deeply embedded glochidia or spine. For these, ultrasound-guided removal using tweezers is a well-documented approach [4]. OR mitt removal would not be ideal for addressing injuries caused by cacti with larger spines; these injuries also tend to be amenable to tweezer removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La relevancia del peligro de salud que estas estructuras representan ha motivado el estudio de las heridas que provocan (Dieter et al, 2017) y la documentación de los métodos para su eliminación de la piel cuando no están enterradas (Ford et al, 2019), antes de llegar a procedimientos quirúrgicos. También existe información para los casos donde ya no están visibles para su extracción, así como de los procedimientos de detección previa (Yousef et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified