1995
DOI: 10.2307/3776764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cactaceae of South America: The Ritter Collections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Climatic variables determine species distribution at broad evolutionary and biogeographic scales (Soberón, 2007; Colwell and Rangel, 2009); therefore, methods that use these variables to produce occurrence probability maps are appropriate to estimate the distribution of species. Information on locality data was obtained from different sources: field excursions, literature (e.g., Eggli et al, 1995; Schulz and Kapitany, 1996; Schulz, 2006; Guerrero et al, 2011b), and the Chilean herbaria CONC and SGO. These locality data are not included here, as it concerns CITES listed species under significant threat due to illegal collecting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climatic variables determine species distribution at broad evolutionary and biogeographic scales (Soberón, 2007; Colwell and Rangel, 2009); therefore, methods that use these variables to produce occurrence probability maps are appropriate to estimate the distribution of species. Information on locality data was obtained from different sources: field excursions, literature (e.g., Eggli et al, 1995; Schulz and Kapitany, 1996; Schulz, 2006; Guerrero et al, 2011b), and the Chilean herbaria CONC and SGO. These locality data are not included here, as it concerns CITES listed species under significant threat due to illegal collecting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revisions of specimens were here used to discuss the morphological trends in the obtained phylogenetic hypothesis. Distribution data was obtained from different sources: field excursions, literature (e.g., Eggli & al., 1995;Guerrero & al., 2011b;Duarte & al., 2014), and the Chilean herbaria CONC and SGO. These locality data are not included here, following CITES norms for species listed under significant threat due to illegal collecting (Goettsch & al., 2015).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…krainziana, and 127 of C. gigantea were used to model the distribution of the taxa. Information on locality data was obtained from different sources: field excursions, literature (Eggli et al 1995;Schulz & Kapitany 1996;Schulz 2006;Guerrero et al 2011a), and Chilean herbaria (CONC, SGO; Thiers continously updated3). All the compiled occurrences were filtered following two criteria for inclusion: (1) occurrence data based on geographic coordinates or accurate locality information; and (2) occurrences registered after 1950 (revealing present day distribution).…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelling and Assessment Of Conservatiomentioning
confidence: 99%