2019 National Conference on Communications (NCC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ncc.2019.8732266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caching Partial Files for Content Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other approaches have been proposed, including online caching based on the history of request arrivals [23], federated learning-based caching [24], dynamic probabilistic caching policies [14], caching models accommodating timevarying request rates [25], online caching algorithms based on content request predictions [26], and joint optimization of service caching and routing [27]. Meanwhile, [12] and [28] accounted for temporal changes in content popularity by modelling the content request process as a stochastic process whose intensity is modulated by an underlying discrete-time Markov chain. The critical difference between our work and [12], [14], [23]- [28] is our assumption that new contents stochastically arrive and the existing ones expire after random lifetimes.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other approaches have been proposed, including online caching based on the history of request arrivals [23], federated learning-based caching [24], dynamic probabilistic caching policies [14], caching models accommodating timevarying request rates [25], online caching algorithms based on content request predictions [26], and joint optimization of service caching and routing [27]. Meanwhile, [12] and [28] accounted for temporal changes in content popularity by modelling the content request process as a stochastic process whose intensity is modulated by an underlying discrete-time Markov chain. The critical difference between our work and [12], [14], [23]- [28] is our assumption that new contents stochastically arrive and the existing ones expire after random lifetimes.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, [12] and [28] accounted for temporal changes in content popularity by modelling the content request process as a stochastic process whose intensity is modulated by an underlying discrete-time Markov chain. The critical difference between our work and [12], [14], [23]- [28] is our assumption that new contents stochastically arrive and the existing ones expire after random lifetimes.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [21] study joint optimization of service caching and routing when request arrivals are Poisson process. The authors in [12] and [22] account for temporal changes in content popularity by modelling the content request process as a stochastic process whose intensity is modulated by an underlying discrete-time Markov chain. The key difference between our work and [12], [14], [17]- [22] is our assumption that new contents stochastically arrive and the existing ones expire after random lifetimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [9] and [10] proposed dynamic delivery of video chunks having different qualities assuming that popular contents are entirely cached. Caching of partial files is presented in [11] when popularity of video segments is different; however, different quality levels for segments are not considered. The goal of this paper is to develop the policy of caching content fractions (e.g., video chunks) and to analyze the impact of caching content fractions on the expected video quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%