2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.13.337253
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CaBagE: a Cas9-based Background Elimination strategy for targeted, long-read DNA sequencing

Abstract: A substantial fraction of the human genome is difficult to interrogate with short-read DNA sequencing technologies due to paralogy, complex haplotype structures, or tandem repeats. Long-read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore’s MinION, enable direct measurement of complex loci without introducing many of the biases inherent to short-read methods, though they suffer from relatively lower throughput. This limitation has motivated recent efforts to develop amplification-free strategies to target and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a technical perspective, we achieved > 500× enrichment on CNBP using the Cas9 protocol, which is robust and comparable to similar assays for the assessment of microsatellite length(Giesselmann et al 2019; Mizuguchi et al 2021; Sone et al 2019; Wallace et al 2021). We also compared Cas9-mediated singleplex vs multiplex enrichment protocols for the first time on clinical samples and observed a consistently lower performance (10-fold lower enrichment, with 70% unclassified reads) in the multiplex environment, as reported by other ONT users in the ONT for other type of samples (Oxford Nanopore Community 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From a technical perspective, we achieved > 500× enrichment on CNBP using the Cas9 protocol, which is robust and comparable to similar assays for the assessment of microsatellite length(Giesselmann et al 2019; Mizuguchi et al 2021; Sone et al 2019; Wallace et al 2021). We also compared Cas9-mediated singleplex vs multiplex enrichment protocols for the first time on clinical samples and observed a consistently lower performance (10-fold lower enrichment, with 70% unclassified reads) in the multiplex environment, as reported by other ONT users in the ONT for other type of samples (Oxford Nanopore Community 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Reads derived from the expanded alleles (41 on average per sample, IQR = 11; Figure 1E ) ranged from 344 bp to as much as 46.6 kbp ( Figure 2D ), confirming the presence of extremely large expansions in these patients. To our knowledge, the latter is the longest repeat expansion analyzed thus far at single-nucleotide resolution(Mizuguchi et al 2021; Sone et al 2019; Giesselmann et al 2019; Wallace et al 2021) and is one of the longest DNA fragments captured by Cas9-mediated enrichment with no specific adjustment(Gilpatrick et al 2020; Iyer et al 2020). Considering average values per sample, the number of repetitive quadruplets varied from 1,371 to 4,421, corresponding to expansion lengths of 5,485–17,685 bp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results therefore specifically highlight the advantage offered by ACME’s ability to reduce competing background reads. Two other Cas9-based targeting approaches that involve background reduction - CaBagE 14 and Negative Enrichment 15 - use exonuclease digestion to eliminate non-target DNA. Both studies have only successfully achieved target read lengths of <35kb in size and pose the additional risk of digesting nicked target fragments that are not protected by Cas9 binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two groups have adapted the principle behind nCATS to perform exonuclease digestion of non-target DNA. Cas9-based Background Elimination (CaBagE) 14 and Negative Enrichment 15 focus on protecting target DNA ends with Cas9, followed by exonuclease digestion of non-target reads. However, both methods have only achieved target read lengths of <35kb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%