1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins Directly Modulate Transcription from the Peroxisome Proliferator- Activated Receptor γ2 Promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
147
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
147
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As positive control, C/EBPa binding to the same promoter region was detectable at day 4 and peaked at day 8 ( Figure 5b, left panel). As negative control, neither C/EBPa nor KLF9 could bind to the À2000-bp region of the PPARg2 promoter ( Figure 5b, right panel; Supplementary Table S1), which is in agreement with previous report that C/EBPa does not bind to the distal region of the PPARg2 promoter, 28 and our observation that KLF9 binds to the 0.6-kb proximal promoter region of PPARg2 (Figure 4). Taken together, the results indicate that KLF9 could directly bind to the promoter region of PPARg2 at the middle stage of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As positive control, C/EBPa binding to the same promoter region was detectable at day 4 and peaked at day 8 ( Figure 5b, left panel). As negative control, neither C/EBPa nor KLF9 could bind to the À2000-bp region of the PPARg2 promoter ( Figure 5b, right panel; Supplementary Table S1), which is in agreement with previous report that C/EBPa does not bind to the distal region of the PPARg2 promoter, 28 and our observation that KLF9 binds to the 0.6-kb proximal promoter region of PPARg2 (Figure 4). Taken together, the results indicate that KLF9 could directly bind to the promoter region of PPARg2 at the middle stage of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies (7,11) revealed that C͞EBP␤, a key transcriptional activator of the C͞EBP␣ and PPAR␥ genes (7,(12)(13)(14)(15), is expressed immediately upon treatment of preadipocytes with differentiation inducers (11). However, acquisition of DNA-binding function by C͞EBP␤ is delayed until 12-16 h after induction (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time at which DNA-binding activity (measured in vitro) is acquired by C͞EBP␤ corresponds exactly to the time at which it associates with centromeres through binding sites on centromeric satellite DNA ex vivo (11). Having acquired DNA-binding function, C͞EBP␤ transcriptionally activates both the C͞EBP␣ and PPAR␥ genes through C͞EBP regulatory elements in their proximal promoters (12)(13)(14)(15). The preadipocytes exit the cell cycle after they have undergone approximately two rounds of mitosis, i.e., MCE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To dissect finely the specific molecular action of SRC-3 in adipocyte differentiation, we examined the impact of SRC-3 on a crucial checkpoint for the adipogenic program, that is, the control of expression of the PPAR␥2 gene (11,12). During fat-cell differentiation, the expression of PPAR␥2 is subject to control by transcription factors such as C͞EBP, the E2Fs, and Kruppel-like factor 5 (13)(14)(15). Based on these prior observations, we tested the transcriptional impact of SRC-3 on an artificial reporter plasmid containing multimerized C͞EBP binding sites.…”
Section: Adipogenesis Is Severely Impaired In the Absence Of Src-3 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%