2013
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CA125-related Measures of Tumor Kinetics and Outcome of Patients with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 CA-125 is the most widely cited and only clinically available biomarker for ovarian cancer. [2][3][4][5][6] While CA-125 can be used as a serum marker of ovarian cancer recurrence, it has a relatively low sensitivity and specificity for Abbreviations CTCs, circulating tumor cells; IRB, Institutional Review Board; PPV, positive predictive value; NPP, negative predictive value; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; OS, overall survival; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transmition the screening and diagnosis of ovarian cancer. 7 Only 50% of patients with early-stage ovarian cancers have elevated serum CA-125, 8 and a number of non-ovarian cancer conditions have falsely elevated CA-125.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 CA-125 is the most widely cited and only clinically available biomarker for ovarian cancer. [2][3][4][5][6] While CA-125 can be used as a serum marker of ovarian cancer recurrence, it has a relatively low sensitivity and specificity for Abbreviations CTCs, circulating tumor cells; IRB, Institutional Review Board; PPV, positive predictive value; NPP, negative predictive value; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; OS, overall survival; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transmition the screening and diagnosis of ovarian cancer. 7 Only 50% of patients with early-stage ovarian cancers have elevated serum CA-125, 8 and a number of non-ovarian cancer conditions have falsely elevated CA-125.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, estimation of the natural growth rate of untreated tumour needs at least two tumour volume estimations prior to therapy, e.g., V d and V i . Furthermore, natural tumour growth rate is correlated with kinetic index [12] and patient survival [13,14] and is also valuable for evaluating therapeutic efficacy [1,2,6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Due to limited availability of diagnostic imaging, an examination close to treatment initiation is in general not possible, and indirect methods for estimation of V i must therefore be developed using, e.g., mathematical models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that SGR is mathematically and biologically a more accurate measure for tumour growth rate than the widely used tumour volume doubling time [3,4]. Although the above equation is originally derived for tumour volume, it can also be used for tumour marker concentration levels for, e.g., prostate specific antigen, PSA [5], and CA125 [6]. Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most patients are required to have CA‐125 testing every a month after their initial treatment for ovarian cancer. When CA‐125 increases above a value that is double the nadir, it suggests a similar performance of growth rate at progression versus Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria and warrants further investigation 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%