2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C9orf72 Poly(PR) Dipeptide Repeats Disturb Biomolecular Phase Separation and Disrupt Nucleolar Function

Abstract: Highlights d R-rich DPRs sequester NPM1 into large, soluble phaseseparation-inhibited complexes d NPM1 sequestration dissolves droplets in vitro and delocalizes nucleolar NPM1 in cells d poly(PR) entraps rRNA in static puncta in vitro and in nucleoli d poly(PR) interactions disrupt nucleolar organization in a length-dependent manner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
150
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(161 reference statements)
18
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome is partially consistent with multiple previous reports that arginine-rich DPRs are cytotoxic when delivered either by way of intracellular expression or through exogenous incubation [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][29][30][31][32]38]. In particular, these results echo findings that have shown that exogenous delivery of PR dipeptide repeat proteins to cells results in cytotoxicity [29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, these results are similar to previous findings suggesting that exogenous polyPR was toxic to primary rat neurons, but not to astrocytes [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This outcome is partially consistent with multiple previous reports that arginine-rich DPRs are cytotoxic when delivered either by way of intracellular expression or through exogenous incubation [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][29][30][31][32]38]. In particular, these results echo findings that have shown that exogenous delivery of PR dipeptide repeat proteins to cells results in cytotoxicity [29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, these results are similar to previous findings suggesting that exogenous polyPR was toxic to primary rat neurons, but not to astrocytes [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…First, different cell lines and incubation times used might account for different degrees of sensitivity; indeed, the different sensitivity between CHO cells and NSC-34 cells is one of our key observations. Secondly, various groups have studied DRPs of different lengths [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][29][30][31][32][33]38] with one group providing clear evidence for changes in toxicity as a function of DRP size [30]. It is possible that results observed in our experiments with 15-mer DRP treatment on cells may not be representative of DRP modes of function at other dipeptide repeat lengths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lopez-Gonzalez et al reported that poly-GR binds to mitochondrial ribosomal proteins and leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and DNA damage [32]. Others reported that poly-GR and poly-PR change the intranuclear distribution of NPM1, which is protective against DNA damage [15,54,62]. Thus, each neurotoxic DPR may affect DNA damage in an individual way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, sense G4C2 and antisense C4G2 expanded repeats are repeat‐associated non‐AUG (RAN) translated into dipeptide repeat (DPR)‐containing proteins, which form inclusions throughout the brain of patients with C9‐ALS/FTD (Ash et al , ; Gendron et al , ; Mori et al , ; Zu et al , ), as well as in mice expressing expanded G4C2 repeats (Chew et al , ; O'Rourke et al , ; Peters et al , ; Jiang et al , ; Liu et al , ). Overexpression of DPR proteins using artificial ATG codons for their translation initiation leads to neurodegeneration in cell and animal models, notably through alteration of mitochondria (Dafinca et al , ; Lopez‐Gonzalez et al , ; Choi et al , ), DNA repair (Walker et al , ; Lopez‐Gonzalez et al , ), nuclear and nucleolar organization (White et al , ; Zhang et al , ), and/or nucleocytoplasmic transport (Kwon et al , ; May et al , ; Mizielinska et al , ; Wen et al , ; Zhang et al , , ; Freibaum et al , ; Jovičić et al , ; Tao et al , ; Boeynaems et al , ; Khosravi et al , ). Third, expanded G4C2 repeats promote DNA epigenetic changes that lead to decreased expression of C9ORF72 mRNA and protein levels in C9‐ALS/FTD individuals (DeJesus‐Hernandez et al , ; Gijselinck et al , ; Almeida et al , ; Waite et al , ; van Blitterswijk et al , ; Xiao et al , ; Saberi et al , ; Frick et al , ; Viodé et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%