2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62261-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C7 Preconception diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, characteristics of the pronuclear stage may mirror the internal chromosomal integrity of the oocyte and the sperm. [ 11,17,18 ] Meanwhile, developmental details such as disorder cleavage, embryonic fragment extrusion, uneven blastomeres, and abnormal morphokinetics during the post‐zygote stage (cleavage, morula, and blastocyst stage) might reflect embryonic developmental dysfunction, mainly aneuploidy, and mosaicism. [ 11–22 ] Due to the vague standard of methods (more than 6 scoring systems) in current pronuclear assessments, [ 12 ] the effect of pronuclear scores remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In theory, characteristics of the pronuclear stage may mirror the internal chromosomal integrity of the oocyte and the sperm. [ 11,17,18 ] Meanwhile, developmental details such as disorder cleavage, embryonic fragment extrusion, uneven blastomeres, and abnormal morphokinetics during the post‐zygote stage (cleavage, morula, and blastocyst stage) might reflect embryonic developmental dysfunction, mainly aneuploidy, and mosaicism. [ 11–22 ] Due to the vague standard of methods (more than 6 scoring systems) in current pronuclear assessments, [ 12 ] the effect of pronuclear scores remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 11,17,18 ] Meanwhile, developmental details such as disorder cleavage, embryonic fragment extrusion, uneven blastomeres, and abnormal morphokinetics during the post‐zygote stage (cleavage, morula, and blastocyst stage) might reflect embryonic developmental dysfunction, mainly aneuploidy, and mosaicism. [ 11–22 ] Due to the vague standard of methods (more than 6 scoring systems) in current pronuclear assessments, [ 12 ] the effect of pronuclear scores remains unclear. The dynamic character of the PN, incongruent practice in IVF laboratories such as fertilization time and checking time, and the heterogeneity in patients make efficient qualitative classification for pronuclear assessment impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%