Abiotic Stress in Plants - Mechanisms and Adaptations 2011
DOI: 10.5772/24936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C4 Plants Adaptation to High Levels of CO2 and to Drought Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of on-going climate change, combinatorial abiotic stresses and the future of crop productivity, eCO 2 takes center stage (Lara and Andreo, 2011;Gray and Brady, 2016). Under eCO 2 conditions, most plants shut stomata, limiting stomatal conductance and water loss (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of on-going climate change, combinatorial abiotic stresses and the future of crop productivity, eCO 2 takes center stage (Lara and Andreo, 2011;Gray and Brady, 2016). Under eCO 2 conditions, most plants shut stomata, limiting stomatal conductance and water loss (Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesophyll CO 2 concentration (C i ) was significantly related to stomatal efficiency (r = -0.793**) and carboxylation efficiency (r = -0.917**). Therefore, it suggests that RuBisCo activity could be preferred in addition to gas exchange rate as finger millet is a C 4 plant, which has CO 2 concentrating mechanism [30].…”
Section: Photosynthetic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Rubisco catalyzes two competing processes: (1) Carboxylation through which carbon is converted to sugars, and (2) oxygenation, where oxygen is added to RuBP creating phosphoglycolate which serves no metabolic purpose and is toxic at high concentrations [92]. Processing phosphoglycolate requires photorespiration which is energy demanding and results in a loss of 25-30% fixed carbon [93]. C 4 photosynthesis overcomes this limitation by spatially separating the sites of CO 2 fixation and assimilation, thus suppressing the oxygenase activity of RuBP.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%