2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C2 Swan band laser-induced fluorescence and chemiluminescence in low-pressure hydrocarbon flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
66
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith et al [43] provided overall quenching rate of C * 2 . These rates were integrated into our reaction mechanism.…”
Section: Chemiluminescence Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Smith et al [43] provided overall quenching rate of C * 2 . These rates were integrated into our reaction mechanism.…”
Section: Chemiluminescence Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The kinetic analysis of reaction mechanism is performed with postprocessor KINALC [48]. In addition, simulations at several experimental conditions were also performed with GRImech 3.0 [40] with added chemiluminescence and C 2 reactions set extracted from [41][42][43] (referred to as GRI3.0+CL in the present work).…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical peak concentrations of CH are about 3.5 × 10 12 molecules/cm 3 in an stoichiometric atmosphericpressure methane flame [21]. For rich low-pressure methane flames, the maximum concentration of C 2 is 1.5 × 10 12 molecules/cm 3 [49]. OH concentrations are, in comparison, typically seven orders of magnitude larger (5 × 10 19 molecules/cm 3 in atmospheric-pressure methane flames [35,42,47] and 6 × 10 14 molecules/cm 3 in lowpressure methane flames [16]).…”
Section: Laskinν 2 Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar, for CH(A) * chemiluminescence, three steps reaction models have been widely researched. However, for C 2 * and CO 2 * reactions, limited information has reported the reaction rates of their formation reactions 4,28,29 . Although a lot of effort has gone into measuring the reaction rates of the excited species formation reactions, the reaction rates measured by different researchers are not in close agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%