Pure Organic Liquids
DOI: 10.1007/10639283_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following correlations give the temperature dependence of the physicochemical properties of alkanes 19,20,21,22,23,24 :…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following correlations give the temperature dependence of the physicochemical properties of alkanes 19,20,21,22,23,24 :…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Stokes–Einstein relation gives the temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient, D , through the temperature dependence of the dynamic viscosity, η. The following correlations give the temperature dependence of the physicochemical properties of alkanes The saturation ratio is obtained as , where T 0 is the initial temperature (ambient temperature in the experiments), for which f = 1. The values of the coefficients a i for the dynamic viscosity, b i for the surface tension, and c i for Henry’s constant ( i = 0–3) are given in Table .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, for all the studied NADES, the viscosity decreases exponentially with increasing temperature and increases with increasing flavonoid content. For the NADES with flavone or flavanone, the viscosity has similar values when the composition is the same for the NADES composed of either thymol or carvacrol, which may be because these two compounds are isomers, as the pure compounds also have similar viscosities (thymol = 26 mPa.s and carvacrol = 28.7 mPa.s at 298 K). However, for NADES containing 2′-hydroxychalcone that is not the case: for the same compositions of thymol or carvacrol, there are some differences in the viscosity.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%