2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C1, regularity for the normalized p-Poisson problem

Abstract: This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This improves one of the regularity results in [3], where a C 1,α estimate was established depending on the L m norm of f under the additional restriction that p > 2 and m > max(2, n, p 2 ) (see Theorem 1.2 in [3]). We also mention that differently from the approach in [3], which uses methods from divergence form theory and nonlinear potential theory in the proof of Theorem 1.2, our method is more non-variational in nature, and it is based on separation of phases inspired by the ideas in [36]. Moreover, for f continuous, our approach also gives a somewhat different proof of the C 1,α regularity result, Theorem 1.1, in [3].…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This improves one of the regularity results in [3], where a C 1,α estimate was established depending on the L m norm of f under the additional restriction that p > 2 and m > max(2, n, p 2 ) (see Theorem 1.2 in [3]). We also mention that differently from the approach in [3], which uses methods from divergence form theory and nonlinear potential theory in the proof of Theorem 1.2, our method is more non-variational in nature, and it is based on separation of phases inspired by the ideas in [36]. Moreover, for f continuous, our approach also gives a somewhat different proof of the C 1,α regularity result, Theorem 1.1, in [3].…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, in order to obtain improvement of flatness at each scale after a rescaling, it is imperative to get uniform C 1 −type estimates independent of |p 0 | for the limiting equations corresponding to the case f ≡ 0. This is precisely done in [3] by an adaptation of the Ishii-Lions approach as in [20], where the authors obtained uniform Lipschitz estimates for solutions to (1.8) for large |p 0 | ′ s when f = 0. In this paper, we follow an approach which is different from that in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently the equivalence of solutions has been studied for various equations. These include the normalized p-Poisson equation [APR17], a non-homogeneous p-Laplace equation [MO] and the normalized p(x)-Laplace equation [Sil18]. Moreover, in [PV] the equivalence is shown for the radial solutions of a parabolic equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then iterate this estimate in a systematic manner, properly adjusted to the intrinsic scaling of equation. Inspired by the recent results from [5,6,8] and [39], we obtain an estimate (Theorem 3.2), which provides a precise control of the oscillation of weak solution of (1.1) in terms of the magnitude of its gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%