1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1011-1344(96)07339-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-SNARF-1 as a pHi fluoroprobe: discrepancies between conventional and intracellular data do not result from protein interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has also been suggested that SNARF-1 does not bind to bovine serum albumin but, rather, that a contaminant present in the commercially available SNARF-1 binds to bovine serum albumin (67). Furthermore, in the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes, a major fraction of the fluoroprobes (0.5-0.9) appears to be bound to proteins (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been suggested that SNARF-1 does not bind to bovine serum albumin but, rather, that a contaminant present in the commercially available SNARF-1 binds to bovine serum albumin (67). Furthermore, in the cytoplasm of cardiac myocytes, a major fraction of the fluoroprobes (0.5-0.9) appears to be bound to proteins (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results differ from those previously reported (42), which show a significant alteration in emission spectra. More recently, however, it was determined that the SNARF variant used in that study (C-SNARF-1) contained a contaminant able to bind to BSA, which led to discrepancies between intracellular and cell-free spectral properties (55). C-SNARF-4 differs from the probe used in that study as it has a lower pKa value (6.4 compared to 7.5) due to a fluorine atom, and it lacks the acetoxymethylester substituent.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We have used C-SNARF-4 in combination with confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) to study single-species Pseudomonas aeruginosa communities and the pH of their microenvironments. Since there have been recent reports suggesting C-SNARF emission characteristics can be influenced by the probe's interaction with various cell components (7,23,38,48,55), we wanted to determine the extent to which biofilm components (i.e., proteins, exopolymers, and bacterial cells) influence C-SNARF-4 emission properties. Accordingly, spectrofluorometric analyses were used to determine the effect of representative matrix components (alginate, bovine serum albumin, P. aeruginosa cells, and growth medium) on the spectral emission properties of the fluorophore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seemed to be in contrast with reported changes in the pK a of cSNARF-1 inside cells (Owen 1992) that were attributed to the binding of the probe to cellular proteins (Seksek et al 1991). However, more-recent data revealed that a contaminant of the commercially distributed substance but not the molecule liberated from cSNARF-1 AM is able to bind to proteins (Yassine et al 1997).…”
Section: Calibration: Linking¯uorescence Signals To Ion Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with their parent compound¯uorescein the modern probes bear additional carboxyls that increase their polarity and intracellular retention. Today, the most widely applied probes for the mapping of cytosolic pH are cSNARF-1, a seminaphthorhoda¯uor dye that allows both excitation and emission ratioing Parton et al 1997;Yassine et al 1997) and Absorption optima are given; these are close to excitation optima but less sensitive to the environment of the molecule (Tsien 1989;Haugland 1996) BCECF, a carboxy¯uorescein derivative used for excitation ratioing (Haugland 1996). The SNAFL probes are seminaphtho¯uoresceins that, in contrast to cSNARF-1, display a stronger emission in their protonated than in their unprotonated form.…”
Section: Ph Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%