1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00271682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-peptide measurement in the differentiation of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

Abstract: To determine whether individual subjects with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes or Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes, who are treated with insulin, could be reliably distinguished, C-peptide concentrations and urinary C-peptide excretion were measured in 10 Caucasoids and 10 Pima Indians. All the subjects had developed diabetes before 21 years of age and were receiving insulin treatment. Fasting C-peptide concentrations were significantly higher in the Pima Indians (0.73 +/- 0.17 versus 0.02 +/- 0.01 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiating Type II diabetes from Type I diabetes in children can be a diagnostic challenge [20]. Even when it occurs at a young age, diabetes in Pimas is not associated with high titres of islet cell antibodies [5], insulin and C-peptide concentrations are not subnormal [8], and exogenous insulin is not required to prevent ketosis [6,7]. For our patients, the clinical features suggest Type II rather than Type I diabetes and include family history of Type II diabetes, lack of symptoms at diagnosis, presence of obesity and low frequency of insulin treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiating Type II diabetes from Type I diabetes in children can be a diagnostic challenge [20]. Even when it occurs at a young age, diabetes in Pimas is not associated with high titres of islet cell antibodies [5], insulin and C-peptide concentrations are not subnormal [8], and exogenous insulin is not required to prevent ketosis [6,7]. For our patients, the clinical features suggest Type II rather than Type I diabetes and include family history of Type II diabetes, lack of symptoms at diagnosis, presence of obesity and low frequency of insulin treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Katzeff e colaboradores, analisando o peptídeo C de dois grupos de crianças, entre os índios Pima com DM2 e caucasóides com DM1, verificaram que a determinação urinária ou plasmática do peptídeo C foi suficiente para discriminar os dois grupos 44 . Os baixos valores encontrados nas crianças caucasianas refletem a insulinopenia típica do DM1, enquanto que o diabetes dos índios Pima, mesmo quando iniciado em idade precoce, não é insulinopênico 44 .…”
Section: Diagnósticounclassified
“…Os baixos valores encontrados nas crianças caucasianas refletem a insulinopenia típica do DM1, enquanto que o diabetes dos índios Pima, mesmo quando iniciado em idade precoce, não é insulinopênico 44 . Assim, valores do peptídeo C no jejum maiores que 0,6 ng/ml (0,2 nmol/l) ou após sobrecarga com Sustacal ® oral maiores que 1,5 ng/ml (0,6 nmol/L) demonstram reservas de insulina significativas 45 .…”
Section: Diagnósticounclassified
“…Characterized by a strong genetic predisposition but without linkage or association to known maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) loci, as well as lack of an insulin requirement for survival and absence of islet-cell antibodies, diabetes in the Pima Indian is entirely type 2 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). In addition, GAD65Ab is not increased in Pima children diagnosed with diabetes (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%