2018
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c‑Met affects gemcitabine resistance during carcinogenesis in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is thought to develop from histologically identifiable intraductal lesions known as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs), which exhibit similar morphological and genetic features to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therefore, a better understanding of the biological features underlying the progression of PanIN is essential to development more effective therapeutic interventions for PDAC. In recent years, numerous studies have reported that MET proto-oncogene receptor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, gemcitabine-resistant cancer cells acquire the hallmarks of EMT in association with an increment of MET phosphorylation and the expression of the stem cell marker CD (cluster of differentiation) [113]. In vivo, knock-out of the MET gene in a mouse model of spontaneous pancreatic neoplasia resulted in a reduction of neoplastic cell proliferation, a predictive marker for chemotherapeutic responses and clinical prognosis [114]. Finally, the inhibition of the tumor–stroma interaction by MET/HGF interception induces stroma remodeling, which results in increased drug delivery and restoration of the response to gemcitabine [106,115].…”
Section: Met/hgf Signaling In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, gemcitabine-resistant cancer cells acquire the hallmarks of EMT in association with an increment of MET phosphorylation and the expression of the stem cell marker CD (cluster of differentiation) [113]. In vivo, knock-out of the MET gene in a mouse model of spontaneous pancreatic neoplasia resulted in a reduction of neoplastic cell proliferation, a predictive marker for chemotherapeutic responses and clinical prognosis [114]. Finally, the inhibition of the tumor–stroma interaction by MET/HGF interception induces stroma remodeling, which results in increased drug delivery and restoration of the response to gemcitabine [106,115].…”
Section: Met/hgf Signaling In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MET/HGF axis have been associated with poor overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients [58]. MET gene is also involved in 1 3 resistance to palliative chemotherapy in PDAC patients, possibly due to the downstream pathway of MET/HGF axis in the maintenance of pancreatic progenitor cells and stem cells [59]. Therefore, MET/HGF pathway is a promising target for therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions and given free access to water and chow, under the ethical agreement of animal study in Osaka University (approved by professor Y. Kaneda as the approval number 24-122-022), of which experimental procedure had been performed as descried previously [14]. Briefly, Kras LSL-G12D strain carries a loxP-stop-loxP sequence followed by constitutive active form of Kras G12D .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have introduced Kras G12D mutation in pancreas specific manner, by crossing Kras LSL-G12D/+ mice with Pdx-1-Cre +/- mice. Kras LSL-G12D mice were crossbred to c-Met Fx to obtain mixed background (C57Bl/6/129/Sv) Kras LSL-G12D/+ ;c-Met Fx/Fx (for spontaneous tumors) or Kras +/+ ,c-Met +/+ (control recipients) mice [14, 15]. We have generated mutation of Kras in pancreas specific manner in mice, which was compared with pancreas specific deletion of c-Met, as described [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation