2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-Fos and ΔFosB expression are differentially altered in distinct subregions of the nucleus accumbens shell in cocaine-sensitized rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, repeated cocaine exposure and place conditioning provoked potent effects on earlygene expression in the core and shell sectors of the N Acc and DMst. It is noteworthy that acute cocaine treatment did not elevate c-Fos levels in the shell sector of the N acc, but the early-gene response did sensitize with repeated exposure, as earlier shown in rats (Brenhouse and Stellar, 2006). A novel finding of these experiments was that pretreatment with the BZT analog blocked cocaine-stimulated CPP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Conversely, repeated cocaine exposure and place conditioning provoked potent effects on earlygene expression in the core and shell sectors of the N Acc and DMst. It is noteworthy that acute cocaine treatment did not elevate c-Fos levels in the shell sector of the N acc, but the early-gene response did sensitize with repeated exposure, as earlier shown in rats (Brenhouse and Stellar, 2006). A novel finding of these experiments was that pretreatment with the BZT analog blocked cocaine-stimulated CPP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Moreover, subterritorial differences in cocaine-induced neuroadaptations have been observed in previous studies (eg Sorg et al, 1995;Robinson et al, 2001;Thomas et al, 2001;Ricci et al, 2004;Brenhouse and Stellar, 2006). The different magnitude of change in firing between core and shell in the present study might thus correspond to a subterritorial difference in the types of neuroadaptations that are induced by cocaine.…”
Section: Core Vs Shellsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Cocaine addiction is defined by an increase in drug-directed behavior and a concomitant weakening of other motivated behaviors (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Although the accumbens and interconnected structures facilitate drugdirected behavior, they also facilitate multiple alternative motivated behaviors (eg Everitt, 1990;Blackburn et al, 1992;Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999;Cardinal et al, 2002;Kelley, 2004;Schwienbacher et al, 2004;Wise, 2004;Salamone et al, 2005). Given the selective changes in behavior that define addiction, it is difficult to envision how a general hypoactivity of the accumbens and interconnected circuits could contribute to drug addiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation of dopamine transmission by psychostimulants induces dose-dependent expression of c-Fos in rat striatum (Brenhouse and Stellar, 2006;Graybiel et al, 1990). This effect is abolished by pretreatment with the D1R antagonist SHC 23390, (Graybiel et al, 1990) and is lost in D1 KO mice (Moratalla et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%