2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

c-erbB-2 is not a major factor in the development of colorectal cancer

Abstract: We have investigated c-erbB-2 protein expression in a large cohort of well-characterized colorectal tumours, and in a subset of lymph node metastases. We have also evaluated a Val 655 Ile single nucleotide polymorphism, which is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, in a subset of the colorectal cancer patients and in healthy control subjects. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that while 81.8% of tumours expressed c-erbB-2, in the majority of cases equivalent levels of c-erb-B2 were seen in ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
56
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(30 reference statements)
7
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that scored intracytoplasmic staining as positive reported larger frequencies, whereas studies that reported only membrane staining as positive was scored lower or zero frequency. [16][17][18][19][22][23][24] The results of the current study appear similar to those of Osako et al, 22 who used the same antibody as in our study. They observed membranous staining in only 3% of colorectal carcinomas (three of 100), and demonstrated gene amplification by Southern blot analysis in one of the three.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies that scored intracytoplasmic staining as positive reported larger frequencies, whereas studies that reported only membrane staining as positive was scored lower or zero frequency. [16][17][18][19][22][23][24] The results of the current study appear similar to those of Osako et al, 22 who used the same antibody as in our study. They observed membranous staining in only 3% of colorectal carcinomas (three of 100), and demonstrated gene amplification by Southern blot analysis in one of the three.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous IHC studies examining HER-2 expression reported different percentages of positive cells, ranging from 0 to 100%. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The major cause of these discrepancies seems to be the different criteria for evaluating the results. Studies that scored intracytoplasmic staining as positive reported larger frequencies, whereas studies that reported only membrane staining as positive was scored lower or zero frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated expression levels of cell cycle proteins and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients reporting conflicting results. 22,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Most studies describe heterogeneous patient populations without stratification for tumor localization (colon vs. rectum) and MSI status and without multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the choice of scoring method and selection of cutoff values for immunoreactivity is rarely described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are many doubts about the prognostic significance of this oncogene in colorectal tumors (13)(14)(15)(16). While authors such as McKay et al (18) or Webb et al (19) found that cerbB-2/neu was of no prognostic value, others including Kay et al (10), Kapitanovic et al (11), and Osako et al (12) (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%