Heat treatments and standards The Milk Marketing Board Report shows that 95 % of liquid milk in England and Wales is pasteurized. In Scotland, the Report of the Chief Medical Officer to the Department of Health (1962) indicates that the pasteurization level is lower, at 79 %; thus the opportunity for milk-borne disease appears to be greater there than in England and Wales. The detail of the remaining percentage of raw milk in England and Wales available Milk-borne disease 111 to transmit milk-borne disease is of interest. Strauss (1960) stated that producerretailers in 1960 were almost the sole source of milk for liquid consumption fresh from the farm and not subjected to heat treatment, and further (E. Strauss, pers. comm.) that the main markets for T.T. farm-bottled milk were rural areas and suburban areas of large towns. As Kaplan, Abdussalam & Bijlenga (1962) point out, no authentic outbreak of disease has been attributed to properly pasteurized, bottled and delivered milk, but the infallibility of the pasteurization process is not absolute, as the conditions necessary for its adequate performance are not always fulfilled. McCallum (1960) described a bacteriological survey, made between 1956 and 1959, of the flora of Glasgow milk as it reached the consumer. She concluded that the resazurin test is capable of detecting only the 'worst' milk. There was complete correlation between coliform test and the psychrophile count for both certified and pasteurized milk. Though the psychrophile count is considered by some to be a more accurate indicator than the coliform test of the bacteriological standard of milk, it is cumbersome to perform, has a long incubation period, and is subject to all the errors of the 37 °C count. The coliform test, on the other hand, detects milks which fail the psychrophile count and is easier to perform. The methylene-blue test was found to be more reliable than the resazurin test and, if a dye test were favoured, might take its place. The results obtained in this survey showed that consumer milk in Glasgow was not of as high a standard as it might be. For certified milk, insufficiently rapid cooling, and for pasteurized milk, badly cleaned bottles, were thought to be the most frequent reasons why samples failed the coliform test. In certified milk a number of samples contained coagulase-positive, penicillin-resistant staphylococci type 42D. Although phage-type 42D is not often a cause of disease in man, it was considered undesirable that consumer milk should contain large numbers of such organisms. For Scotland as a whole (Scottish Health Statistics, 1960), the following proportions of different grades of milk failed to satisfy the prescribed bacteriological tests: 21-63 % certified, 17-38 % T.T., 3-7 % pasteurized, and 3-08 % T.T. pasteurized. Mackenzie (1960) concluded that from a purely laboratory standpoint, five tests should be used for a milk control programme: on raw milk, the direct microscopic count supplemented by the resazurin reduction test, which is of value in the detection ...