2010
DOI: 10.1179/003962610x12572516251925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C/a Code Multipath Mitigation at GPS Base Stations for Improved DGPS Corrections Using Wavelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Author of this article is extremely grateful to the co-authors of the initial study Dammalage et al (2010), notably, Prof. Chalermchon Satirapod of the Department of Survey Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Author of this article is extremely grateful to the co-authors of the initial study Dammalage et al (2010), notably, Prof. Chalermchon Satirapod of the Department of Survey Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of non-common mode errors both at the reference and the point of observations, and the remaining common mode errors characteristically form a noise-like variation in the time domain [5]. For some GPS applications, however, the estimation of precise carrier phase DGPS correction is crucial; for instance, in deformation or landslide monitoring and large structure dynamic monitoring, where most analyses and predictions are based on the noisy-like variation of the position of observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the presently available GPS receivers utilize almost all the state-of-the-art technical improvements in GPS hardware and processing algorithms. However, still these GPS receivers suffer from significant positioning errors due to signal propagation delays through ionosphere and troposphere, satellite and receiver clock errors, bias on ephemeris data, multipath, and receiver and measurement noises [6][7][8]. Hence, the standard positioning service (SPS) accuracy widely varies with time, place, and most importantly, GPS receiver performance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%