2002
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bystander-induced Apoptosis and Premature Differentiation in Primary Urothelial Explants after Charged Particle Microbeam Irradiation

Abstract: The ureter primary explant technique was developed to study bystander effects under in vivo like conditions where stem and differentiated cells are present. Irradiation was performed with a 3He2+ charged particle microbeam available at the Gray Cancer Institute, with high (approximately 2 microns) precision. Tissue sections from porcine ureters were pre-irradiated with the microbeam at a single location with 10 3He2+ particles (5 MeV; LET 70 keV.micron-1). After irradiation, the tissue section was incubated fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the fraction of micronucleated and apoptotic cells did not exceed 1-2% of the total number of the cells within the explant outgrowth and there was evidence for premature terminal differentiation that was interpreted as a protective effect. The potential to produce bystander-induced damage in this system seemed to depend on the proliferative status of the irradiated cell (Belyakov et al, 2002(Belyakov et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Bystander Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the fraction of micronucleated and apoptotic cells did not exceed 1-2% of the total number of the cells within the explant outgrowth and there was evidence for premature terminal differentiation that was interpreted as a protective effect. The potential to produce bystander-induced damage in this system seemed to depend on the proliferative status of the irradiated cell (Belyakov et al, 2002(Belyakov et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Bystander Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It can cause changes in gene expression, disruption of mitochondrial processes, cell cycle arrest, and apoptotic cell death [Amundson and Fornace, 2003;Belyakov et al, 2002Belyakov et al, , 2003Belyakov et al, , 2006Criswell et al, 2003;Fei and El-Deiry, …”
Section: Direct Effects Of Radiation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most interestingly, several cytokines can be induced by ROS and NO/NOS (Ayache et al, 2002;Hsu and Wen, 2002;Kosmidou et al, 2002;Hwang et al, 2004;Ryan et al, 2004) providing a possible link between different factors potentially involved in bystander signalling. End points used for the study of bystander effects in vitro have included micronuclei formation (Azzam et al, 2002;Kashino et al, 2004;Shao et al, 2004), gene mutations and genomic instability (Zhou et al, 2000), gene expression changes (Azzam et al, 2002;Yang et al, 2005), transformation (Sawant et al, 2001), proliferation (Gerashchenko and Howell, 2003), cell survival, apoptosis (Belyakov et al, 2002;Lyng et al, 2002), cell cycle arrest (Azzam et al, 2000) and most recently the induction of gH2AX foci in bystander cells (Hu et al, 2005;Sokolov et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%