2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-04967-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bypassing the Uncanny Valley: Sex Robots and Robot Sex Beyond Mimicry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, this idea of relational epistemologies or emerging ontologies has attracted many theorists from various backgrounds. Bruno Latour's actor network theory [14], without relying explicitly on Spinoza, follows the same route-as do Karen Barad's agential realism [5,13], Philippe Descola's and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro's works on ontologies and perspectivism [15,16], or the wider field of feminist STS [17][18][19][20][21][22]. All of them oppose the modernist dualism of mind and body and the naturalist demarcation of the realms of the human and the nonhuman in absolute terms.…”
Section: Historical Backdropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, this idea of relational epistemologies or emerging ontologies has attracted many theorists from various backgrounds. Bruno Latour's actor network theory [14], without relying explicitly on Spinoza, follows the same route-as do Karen Barad's agential realism [5,13], Philippe Descola's and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro's works on ontologies and perspectivism [15,16], or the wider field of feminist STS [17][18][19][20][21][22]. All of them oppose the modernist dualism of mind and body and the naturalist demarcation of the realms of the human and the nonhuman in absolute terms.…”
Section: Historical Backdropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may include addiction-like or obsessive–compulsive behaviours, increased social isolation, and reduced social skills [ 114 , 190 ]. Furthermore, if designers do not consider the importance of respect, mutuality, inclusivity, and diversity in human sexuality, erobots could end up perpetuating or reinforcing limited categories of social differences (e.g., gender/sex, race, and class), toxic patriarchal power dynamics, and rape culture (e.g., the objectification and commodification of women/females, ideas that men/males are owed sex, and problematic gender/sex stereotypes; [ 52 , 129 , 159 , 170 , 185 , 210 , 241 , 249 ]). They could conform to (or exacerbate) our ideologies by only providing us with information that reinforce our world view—an erotic filter bubble [ 229 ].…”
Section: Beneficial Erotic Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution is to ensure that erobots reflect and maintain diversity in their evolving supply of traits (e.g., gender/sex, forms, behaviours, and personalities). After all, they can theoretically take any form and enact behaviours that contribute to human (erotic) well-being; they could echo the complexity and diversity of human sexuality [ 64 , 170 ]. However, this is unlikely to be enough since at the core of the human-erobot interaction and co-evolution problem is also another issue: the Standard Model of AI design.…”
Section: Beneficial Erotic Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, people can develop durable relationships with all kinds of counterparts. I have argued elsewhere (Kubes 2019) that, whereas easily identifiable anthropomorphic features may facilitate the establishment of emotional bonds, almost any kind of "anthropomorphic anchoring point" (ibid.) will do.…”
Section: Ontologies Of Lovementioning
confidence: 99%