Bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy: Immediate and long-term results

Marinelli, Giuseppe; Chiappini, Bruno; Eusanio, Marco Di; Bartolomeo, Roberto Di; Caldarera, Ilaria; Marrozzini, Cinzia; Marzocchi, Antonío; Pierangeli, A

doi:10.1067/mtc.2002.124670

Cited by 54 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Coronary endarterectomy has also been shown to safely achieve complete coronary revascularisation with acceptable results, even in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease [7]. However, some studies have reported an increased incidence of mortality and morbidity, especially if coronary endarterectomy was performed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Coronary endarterectomy in the current era

Tiruvoipati

Loubani

Peek³

2005

Current Opinion in Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Coronary endarterectomy in the current era

Tiruvoipati

Loubani

Peek³

2005

Current Opinion in Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there is division of opinion among many surgeons about the safety and effectiveness of the technique; although proponents claim that it is the last option for patients with end-stage CAD [4,5], opponents assert that it is associated with higher mortality and morbidity [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early and mid-term results of coronary endarterectomy: Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass and surgical techniques

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

) on-pump coronary artery bypass with coronary endarterectomy (ONCAB-CE) versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with coronary endarterectomy (OPCAB-CE), and 2) "open" versus "closed" surgical techniques. Operative mortality and major morbidity, were investigated including perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI), and overall survival. Results: Operative mortality was 4.7% (3/64), and no PMI was observed in the study. No statistical differences in operative mortality rate between the ONCAB-CE and OPCAB-CE groups were found (3.1% vs. 6.2%, p = 1.0) or between open versus closed techniques (6.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.6). The incidence of major morbidity including cerebrovascular accident, atrial fibrillation, acute renal failure, mediastinitis, respiratory complications, and bleeding was comparable between all groups. There were seven late mortalities, and no differences were found in overall survival rate between all groups. Conclusions: Coronary endarterectomy appears to be a safe option for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, regardless of whether CPB or a specified selection of surgical techniques are used. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 3: 242-249)

show abstract

“…Long‐term survival of MCE was 64% at five years and 36% at 10 years. The previously reported survival of coronary endarterectomy ranges from 70% to 91% at five years 1–5,8 and 45% to 74% at 10 years 1,2 . There is no previous report on the long‐term outcome of MCE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coronary endarterectomy has been shown to be feasible and effective for revascularization of a diffusely diseased coronary artery. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In cases with multivessel diffuse coronary artery disease, we may achieve complete myocardial revascularization with multiple coronary endarterectomy (MCE). However, the outcome of MCE remains poorly defined.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%