Bycatch: interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery

Trading expertise: The rise and demise of an industry/government committee on survey trawl design

“…that allows for conversations and collaborations across the boundary. Jenkins (2007; applied the trading zone framework to analyze relationships between the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the shrimp fishing industry in the creation, evolution and adoption of a device for preventing nets from catching turtles. Based on her application of the trading zone framework to her specific case, she hypothesized that changes along the level of homogeneity/heterogeneity are due to variations in the degree of shared language; she suggests that as the "ability to communicate increases, the flow of information that can result in changes in another culture will also increase, thus altering the degree of heterogeneity" (Jenkins 2010: 83).…”

From conflict to collaboration: The role of expertise in fisheries management

“…A couple of case studies (Carolan, 2006;Collins and Sanders, 2007) have shown that the inclusion of interactional expertise into a science decisionmaking process increased communication and was sufficient for improving the process, while other case studies (Jenkins, 2007(Jenkins, , 2010aJohnson, 2011;Johnson and McCay, 2012) have shown that interactional expertise only led to a brief improvement that was not ultimately sustained. Among this group of case studies the defining difference was the pre-existing and shared culture of values, traditions, and mutual respect or the lack thereof.…”

“…The growth of the field of SEE is in part because SEE offers a promising framework for how to bridge the disciplinary disconnects prevalent in the multidisciplinary approaches needed to address complex real-world problems. The areas of study of those who have published on SEE include psychology (Gorman, 2002), sociology and physics (Collins and Sanders, 2007), environmental studies (Jenkins, 2007), and ethics and philosophy (Selinger et al, 2007). The papers often feature retrospective application of SEE concepts to explain past events in science and science-policy decision making (i.e.…”

“…The papers often feature retrospective application of SEE concepts to explain past events in science and science-policy decision making (i.e. decisions that pertain to matters of science or science policy regardless of whether the decision is made by a scientist or science policymaker) (Boyce, 2006;Carolan, 2006;Collins and Evans, 2002;Evans and Plows, 2007;Jenkins, 2007Jenkins, , 2010aRibeiro, 2007;Weinel, 2007). In some cases the articles are derived from the author's experience as a participant in the event (Collins, 2007;Collins and Evans, 2002;Collins and Sanders, 2007;Shrager, 2007).…”

“…At their heart fisheries management conflicts are often about the implications that scientific findings and technological regulations hold for fishing communities. There are several case studies in the literature focusing on SEE and fisheries management (Jenkins, 2007(Jenkins, , 2010aJohnson, 2011;Johnson and McCay, 2012). This paper will draw on this subset of the SEE literature, examining how SEE helps explain past failures of collaborative efforts in fisheries management, and how SEE might be enhanced with future research.…”