2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bycatch and discards by Taiwanese large-scale tuna longline fleets in the Indian Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a notable imbalance ([80% of peerreviewed papers) between studies focussing on elasmobranchs in the industrial and semi-industrial fisheries e.g. (Fennessy 1994;Huang and Liu 2010;Kiszka and van der Elst 2015;Romanov 2002) and the small-scale fisheries (Molina and Cooke 2012). Published information for small-scale fisheries is generally sparsely quantified and limited to target species (e.g.…”
Section: Elasmobranch Interaction With Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a notable imbalance ([80% of peerreviewed papers) between studies focussing on elasmobranchs in the industrial and semi-industrial fisheries e.g. (Fennessy 1994;Huang and Liu 2010;Kiszka and van der Elst 2015;Romanov 2002) and the small-scale fisheries (Molina and Cooke 2012). Published information for small-scale fisheries is generally sparsely quantified and limited to target species (e.g.…”
Section: Elasmobranch Interaction With Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, age- and stage-structured population models explicitly modeling bycatch poorly fitted the observed data from the Crozet Islands [27]. This conundrum cannot be explained by the implementation of mitigating measures to reduce albatross bycatch, since (i) these measures were not adopted until the late 1990s and compliance was low in the first years of implementation [28], (ii) mitigation would have affected only the part of the fisheries that overlapped with the foraging areas of wandering albatrosses [28], (iii) albatross bycatch mortality remained high in tuna longline fleets in the southern Indian Ocean where similar, although less numerous, mitigation measures were implemented [29], and (iv) large Illegal Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) longline fishing fleets were operating from the mid-1990s until the mid-2000s [24], [28]. Therefore the increase in the population of wandering albatrosses at Possession Island, and at other breeding sites in the southern Indian Ocean, remains paradoxical [30], [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there exist a number of reports about such captures of albatrosses by fishing vessels (e.g., Gales et al 1998;Petersen et al 2009;Huang and Liu 2010), our record provides an example that such interactions may not be systematically lethal for the birds. In the present case, the albatross was released alive at sea and found more than 5 months later on a nest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Wilson et al (2014) highlighted the paucity of reports on incidentally caught seabirds being released alive compared with other marine organisms. Few seabirds are usually able to escape from pelagic longline fishing gear indeed (but see Huang and Liu 2010), and as a result sub-lethal effects of bycatch remain virtually undocumented for seabirds today (as opposed to crustaceans and mammals, Wilson et al 2014). Indirect effects of incidental capture would thus need to be considered in future surveys of colonies with high risks of individual interaction with long-liners, in addition to the existing monitoring of fisheries-related items at seabird colonies (e.g., Nel and Nel 1999;Bugoni et al 2010;Phillips et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%