2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0129-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

By the numbers: ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications

Abstract: Although >10,000 behavioral health applications (“apps”) are currently available on the Apple and Google Play marketplaces, they have been minimally evaluated or regulated and little is known about “real world” usage patterns. This investigation combined data from online behavioral health app rating frameworks and a mobile health market research firm to identify the most downloaded apps as well as determine rating and ranking concordance between frameworks. Findings demonstrated that the most commonly download… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
114
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As the MARS has proven its feasibility and psychometric quality in existing works and evaluations [14]- [16], the authors of the current work decided to develop a database solution that shall support making the MARS expert ratings for mHealth apps available to the public more easily and comprehensively. This is necessary, since consumers are particularly vulnerable right now, since the mHealth market is not well regulated and most of the currently available mHealth apps are not scientifically evaluated [15]- [17]. Thus, there is an urgent need to inform users, patients, and healthcare providers about the quality of mHealth apps [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the MARS has proven its feasibility and psychometric quality in existing works and evaluations [14]- [16], the authors of the current work decided to develop a database solution that shall support making the MARS expert ratings for mHealth apps available to the public more easily and comprehensively. This is necessary, since consumers are particularly vulnerable right now, since the mHealth market is not well regulated and most of the currently available mHealth apps are not scientifically evaluated [15]- [17]. Thus, there is an urgent need to inform users, patients, and healthcare providers about the quality of mHealth apps [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported articles already demanded more observational study, validation of effectiveness, clinical trial and more empirical evidence [66], [70]. Our paper also finds that there is a clear gap to understand and link the need and user adoption to adequately evaluate the digital mental health support on the mobile platform.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Digital Supportmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A critical exploration of 25 behavioral health apps, [66] revealed the need for standardization of the quality of such apps and a more effective metric to inform the users. [66] urged for better guidance for the apps that not only include evidence but also integrate disclosed consumer choices.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Digital Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new framework enables a detailed examination of the stability of memory and its relationship to fluctuations in clinical state within the individual, and as such may generate the critical assays for personalized medicine purposes 4 . Furthermore, this approach offers a practically viable method in ambulatory settings where mobile technology is increasingly used for clinical purposes 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%