2019
DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2019.1607255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buying, selling and outsourcing educational reform: the Global Education Industry and ‘policy borrowing’ in the Gulf

Abstract: 'best global practices'. We argue that the outcome is a commercial model of applied 'comparative education' designed for 'selling to the other' and it is both distinctive and ineffective; it also provides a vision of the future as educational policymaking is increasingly outsourced to the private sector. We conclude with a discussion of the conditions which facilitated this approach and of the consequences of relying on it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participation in these assessments helps countries to benefit from expert advice in order to improve students' performance (Elliott et al, 2019;Nóvoa & Yariv-Mashal, 2003). Countries also selectively borrow from reference societies that score high on international assessments (e.g., Singapore and Finland) to ameliorate their education systems (Mohamed & Morris, 2021;Steiner-Khamsi, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation in these assessments helps countries to benefit from expert advice in order to improve students' performance (Elliott et al, 2019;Nóvoa & Yariv-Mashal, 2003). Countries also selectively borrow from reference societies that score high on international assessments (e.g., Singapore and Finland) to ameliorate their education systems (Mohamed & Morris, 2021;Steiner-Khamsi, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on ILSA results, countries can borrow best practices from those demonstrating higher performance. This borrowing and lending of practices can be between developed and developing countries, or a developed country may adapt practices from others (Chung, 2016;Mohamed & Morris, 2021;Pettersson et al, 2017). It is argued that secondary analysis of ILSA data is more beneficial for the countries pertaining to their participation with the Rationale choice or Policy diffusion models (Torney-Purta & Amadeo, 2013), as it would provide more evidence for justifying their decisions of policy revision or borrowing.…”
Section: What Motivates Countries To Partake In Ilsa?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qatar is one of the six Gulf monarchies studied by Mohammed and Morris (2019). They note how the major educational reforms were generated by 'policy borrowing' in a very specific sense.…”
Section: Pisa Datamentioning
confidence: 99%