2020
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2020.1767599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Buy British’: An analysis of UK attempts to turn a slogan into government policy in the 1970s and 1980s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The British COO effect How and why FMCG manufacturers choose to communicate their product's provenance is multifaceted, including consumers' engagement with it and malleable over time. For example, using a "British mark" has previously resulted in the devaluation of brands whilst possessing questionable influence upon shoppers, with manufacturers once choosing to avoid such promotional techniques (Clayton and Higgins, 2020;Vieira, 2017). The "Buy British" movement of the 1970 and 1980s instigated by the UK government to overcome the economic turmoil of the time failed to resolve the issues caused by increased globalisation and deindustrialisation, where consumers were uninfluenced in purchasing domestic goods, with attributes of British goods suffering from the stereotypical views of being unreliable or of inferior quality to foreign equivalents (Clayton and Higgins, 2020).…”
Section: The Coo Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The British COO effect How and why FMCG manufacturers choose to communicate their product's provenance is multifaceted, including consumers' engagement with it and malleable over time. For example, using a "British mark" has previously resulted in the devaluation of brands whilst possessing questionable influence upon shoppers, with manufacturers once choosing to avoid such promotional techniques (Clayton and Higgins, 2020;Vieira, 2017). The "Buy British" movement of the 1970 and 1980s instigated by the UK government to overcome the economic turmoil of the time failed to resolve the issues caused by increased globalisation and deindustrialisation, where consumers were uninfluenced in purchasing domestic goods, with attributes of British goods suffering from the stereotypical views of being unreliable or of inferior quality to foreign equivalents (Clayton and Higgins, 2020).…”
Section: The Coo Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst provenance information becomes a profound and influential, yet malleable product attribute assisting consumers within their purchasing decisions, perceptions of the British brand specifically has fluctuated over time (e.g. Dyer, 2017; Clayton and Higgins, 2020). With grounding in expectancy value theory and cue selection theories, this investigation seeks to explore customer beliefs regarding the importance and wider meanings that products and brands of UK origins, including the COO label itself in communicating such attributes, offers when, through globalisation and other social or political transformations, the wider meaning and purpose of the nation state has become redefined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New technologies such as online information systems and the 1979 lifting of exchange controls then positioned London as a leader in foreign exchange. Clayton and Higgins explore the ‘Buy British’ programs in response to increasing globalization in the 1970s and 1980s, arguing that concerns about the quality and style of British products, rather than price, should have been the focus of the campaign. Thorsheim investigates how Britain removed an estimated 3 million tons of ferrous scrap metal from West Germany in 1945–9, which was treated as war booty rather than official reparations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%