2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Butyric acid dominant volatile fatty acids production: Bio-augmentation of mixed culture fermentation by Clostridium butyricum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the bioaugmentation of C. aceticum enhanced not only acetic acid production but also increased propionic acid production indirectly and other acid productions (Alexander and Weuster-Botz, 2017). Nevertheless, the bioaugmentation of mixed culture by C. butyricum showed that the dominant acid type (propionic acid) was shifted to butyric acid by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020). In addition, their results stated that bioaugmentation of C. butyricum did not only change dominant acid type but also significantly affect the VFA composition as well: propionic acid was decreased (from 60 ± 12 to 30 ± 17%) whereas, acetic (from 12 ± 7 to 20 ± 11%), butyric (from 21 ± 9 to 35 ± 4%), and valeric (from 8 ± 4 to 15 ± 5%) acids were increased by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020).…”
Section: Volatile Fatty Acid Composition Shift At the Bioaugmented Reactormentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the bioaugmentation of C. aceticum enhanced not only acetic acid production but also increased propionic acid production indirectly and other acid productions (Alexander and Weuster-Botz, 2017). Nevertheless, the bioaugmentation of mixed culture by C. butyricum showed that the dominant acid type (propionic acid) was shifted to butyric acid by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020). In addition, their results stated that bioaugmentation of C. butyricum did not only change dominant acid type but also significantly affect the VFA composition as well: propionic acid was decreased (from 60 ± 12 to 30 ± 17%) whereas, acetic (from 12 ± 7 to 20 ± 11%), butyric (from 21 ± 9 to 35 ± 4%), and valeric (from 8 ± 4 to 15 ± 5%) acids were increased by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020).…”
Section: Volatile Fatty Acid Composition Shift At the Bioaugmented Reactormentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, the bioaugmentation of mixed culture by C. butyricum showed that the dominant acid type (propionic acid) was shifted to butyric acid by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020). In addition, their results stated that bioaugmentation of C. butyricum did not only change dominant acid type but also significantly affect the VFA composition as well: propionic acid was decreased (from 60 ± 12 to 30 ± 17%) whereas, acetic (from 12 ± 7 to 20 ± 11%), butyric (from 21 ± 9 to 35 ± 4%), and valeric (from 8 ± 4 to 15 ± 5%) acids were increased by bioaugmentation (Atasoy and Cetecioglu, 2020). Therefore, despite pH (Atasoy et al, 2019b;Eryildiz et al, 2020), substrate type (Jankowska et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2017), and temperature (Jiang et al, 2013;Vanwonterghem et al, 2015) affected the VFA composition, the current results showed that type of monoculture in bioaugmentation is also one of the important parameters to effect acid type in fermentation.…”
Section: Volatile Fatty Acid Composition Shift At the Bioaugmented Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bioaugmentation has been received more focus on the function enhancement of microbial consortia in traditional fermented food. Bioaugmentation can produce desired products (Atasoy, et al 2020;Viesser, Jéssica A. 2021;Wang, W.H.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%