2012
DOI: 10.1021/jm300230a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Butyl Pocket Formation in the Vitamin D Receptor Strongly Affects the Agonistic or Antagonistic Behavior of Ligands

Abstract: Previously, we reported that 22S-butyl-25,26,27-trinor-1α,24-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)2 represents a new class of antagonist for the vitamin D receptor (VDR). The crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of VDR complexed with 2 showed the formation of a butyl pocket to accommodate the 22-butyl group and insufficient interactions between ligand 2 and the C-terminus of VDR. Here, we designed and synthesized new analogues 5a-c and evaluated their biological activities to probe whether agonistic activity i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the accommodation of such larger groups in the small cavity might not contribute significantly to stabilizing AF-2 for co-activator binding, it may provide opportunities to improve the compound binding affinity. This concept of converting an agonist into an antagonist by weakening or abolishing interactions between the ligand and the terminal helix 12 (AF-2) is reminiscent of VDR antagonists, which unlike their agonist counterparts, have insufficient interactions with residues in the AF-2 helix 42 , 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the accommodation of such larger groups in the small cavity might not contribute significantly to stabilizing AF-2 for co-activator binding, it may provide opportunities to improve the compound binding affinity. This concept of converting an agonist into an antagonist by weakening or abolishing interactions between the ligand and the terminal helix 12 (AF-2) is reminiscent of VDR antagonists, which unlike their agonist counterparts, have insufficient interactions with residues in the AF-2 helix 42 , 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compound with a butyl group induced the formation of a new cavity in the LBD (Fig. E, green) . Intriguingly, these ligands exhibited antagonistic activity, suggesting that expansion of the ligand‐binding pocket decreases the transcriptional activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X‐ray structure of VDR in complex with 22 S ‐butyl‐25,26,27‐trinor‐1α,24‐dihydroxyvitamin D 3 showed that the compound forms poor hydrophobic contacts with the AF‐2 helix and, surprisingly, induces the formation of a small cavity within the ligand‐binding pocket to accommodate the butyl moiety; this ligand‐induced structural feature in the canonical VDR LBD had not been observed previously . The cavity, known as the “butyl pocket,” is believed to be strongly linked to the agonistic or antagonistic behavior of the ligand, and it serves to demonstrate that flexible regions in the LBD can be exploited for fine‐tuning NR activity . Based on structure‐activity relation studies, the 22 S ‐hexyl analog was originally designed to be a more potent antagonist than its progenitors.…”
Section: Current Status Of Pxr Antagonist Development Challenges Anmentioning
confidence: 87%