2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00200-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a preparative regimen for allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
123
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
123
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The replacement of Cy with the NA Flu has shown good efficacy with reduced toxicity. We demonstrated excellent results with the Flu-Bu combination in patients undergoing transplant for AML(8), and our results were corroborated in prospective, multicenter, randomized studies of Flu-Bu vs. Bu- Cy(33)(13) in AML, in which the patients treated with Flu-Bu had a significantly lower rate of NRM rate compared with Bu-Cy2, with similar overall and disease-free survival in the two groups. The Flu-Bu combination has also been tested in ALL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The replacement of Cy with the NA Flu has shown good efficacy with reduced toxicity. We demonstrated excellent results with the Flu-Bu combination in patients undergoing transplant for AML(8), and our results were corroborated in prospective, multicenter, randomized studies of Flu-Bu vs. Bu- Cy(33)(13) in AML, in which the patients treated with Flu-Bu had a significantly lower rate of NRM rate compared with Bu-Cy2, with similar overall and disease-free survival in the two groups. The Flu-Bu combination has also been tested in ALL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…RIC potentially extends the curative graft-versus-leukemia effect to patients of older age or to young patients with significant comorbidities. [179][180][181][182] Conditioning intensity varies. For instance, busulfan/fludarabine is more dose-intense than fludarabine/low-dose total-body irradiation.…”
Section: -5977174177mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Finally, in the most recently reported study in AML patients aged 40-65 years, BuCy showed higher 1-year NRM versus BuFlu but no differences in 5-year DFS. 52 The results therefore supported improved safety with BuFlu compared with BuCy but this did not confer any real advantage in terms of survival. Another area of interest is the role of BuFlu as an alternative to RIC regimens in elderly patients, a population who would be suitable for both types of conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%