Business transformation in heterogeneous environments: The impact of market development and firm strength on retrenchment and growth reconfiguration

Abstract

Asset reconfiguration by both growth and divestiture underlies business transformation, but reconfiguration remains poorly understood in countries with limited market infrastructure. We argue that more developed infrastructure facilitates resource reconfiguration, assisting weak firms' attempts to retrench and strong firms' attempts to grow; in turn, market development shapes the impact of reconfiguration by enhancing the benefits of adding assets and limiting the benefits of divestitures. We examine reconfiguration activity by 1,256 firms based in eight South East Asian economies-Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand-from 1990 to 1999 INTRODUCTIONAsset reconfiguration is an important means of resource development for firms throughout the world. Studies of business dynamics have demonstrated that reconfiguring resources via modes such as acquisitions, alliances, internal development, and divestiture influences firm performance (Capron, 1999; Mitchell, 2000, 2004;Moliterno and Wiersema, 2007). The studies show that the motivation to reconfigure a firm's resource base can come from two sources: financial distress, where struggling firms face pressure to reconfigure resources in attempts to increase their operating efficiency (Bibeault, 1982;Robbins and Pearce, 1992), and financial strength, where strong firms reconfigure resources to improve their competitive position (Hopkins, 1991;Montgomery and Thomas, 1988;Koza, Tallman, and Ataay, 2011). In addition to such firm-level sources, studies of international business and institutional environments have argued that the extent of market development strongly affects business strategy and performance (Nelson, 1995;Hoskisson et al., 2000;Cuervo-Cazurra and Dau, 2009). To date, though, studies of asset reconfiguration primarily focus on firms operating in countries with well-developed market infrastructure, without considering how market development itself affects the extent to which firms are able to undertake different forms of resource reconfiguration and how Keywords: growth; acquisitions; divestiture; asset reconfiguration; institutional environment *Correspondence to: Will Mitchell, Duke University, The Fuqua School of Business, 1 Towerview Dr., Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A. E-mail: willm@duke.edu Global Strategy JournalGlobal Strat. J., 1: 6-26 (2011) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1111DOI: 10. /j.2042DOI: 10. -5805.2011 Copyright © 2011 Strategic Management Society reconfiguration, in turn, affects firm performance in different environments. This study argues that stronger market-oriented institutions facilitate resource reconfiguration, helping weak firms retrench and strong firms grow; in turn, market development enhances the benefits of adding assets, but limits the benefits of divesting assets.We frame the study by drawing on studies of asset reconfiguration, especially the resource-based and dynamic capabilities theories of business strategy (Helfat et al., 2007;Penrose, ...

Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation

“…Chakrabarti, Vidal, and Mitchell (2011) argued that the development of institutional market environment strongly affects the ability of firms to reconfigure resources and businesses, as well as to benefit from such reconfigurations. For instance, growth reconfigurations may lead to lower transaction costs in well-developed markets, resulting in more benefits being derived.…”

Virtuous or vicious cycles? The role of divestitures as a complementary Penrose effect within resource‐based theory

“…The most common view has been that low performing firms conduct divestitures in efforts to reduce excess capacity and/or free up resources (Chakrabarti, Vidal, & Mitchell, 2011;Villalonga, 2004). Divestitures can help low performers repay debt (Brown, James, & Mooradian, 1994) and free up financial and managerial resources to reinvest in new avenues that may drive future growth (Haynes, Thompson, & Wright, 2003).…”

Trends in corporate restructuring in the world and Serbia

“…Chakrabarti, Vidal & Mitchell, 2011;Wan & Yiu, 2009;Yawson, 2009). Изненадне, велике и непредвиђене промене утичу на погоршање перформанси пословања предузећа и захтевају промене које по свом оби-му и карактеру превазилазе "уобичајене организационе" промене.…”