Business simulation and assurance of learning

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to consider assurance of learning among undergraduate business students enrolled in capstone business strategy courses using the GLO-BUS competitive simulation. Gender, academic major and business core course performance were examined. Design/methodology/approach Participants were 595 undergraduate capstone business students from 21 course sections taught over a four-year period. Variables included learning assurance measures, simulation performance, gender, major, business core course grades, capstone course grade and cumulative grade point average. Correlations, linear regression, multiple regression and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Findings Learning assurance report scores were strongly related to simulation performance. Simulation performance was related to capstone course grade, which, in turn, was significantly related to the grade point average (GPA). Core business courses were related to learning assurance and performance indicators. Significant differences for gender and degree major were found for academic performance measures. Women and men did not differ in simulation performance. Research limitations/implications Limitations include the use of one simulation (GLO-BUS) and studying students at one university taught by one professor. Assurance of learning measures needs further study as factors in business program evaluation. Future research should analyze post-graduate performance and career achievements in relation to assurance of learning outcomes. Originality/value This study conducts empirical analyses of simulation learning that focuses entirely on direct measures, including student characteristics (gender, major), learning assurance measures, business core course grades, capstone course grades and student GPAs.

Insights from pre Covid-19 perceptions of law students on four learning methods: implications for future design of blended learning

“…Learning is a cognitive process, where learners process new knowledge based on prior knowledge (Ghadirian et al, 2018); New knowledge is best captured by learners when it is rooted in a context or environment familiar to the learner (Podschuweit and Bernholt, 2018); Experiential learning stimulates knowledge acquisition and processing (Sung et al, 2017;Alstete and Beutell, 2019;Bassi, 2019); New knowledge is first processed by the sensory memory, then by short-term memory, and finally is stored in long-term memory (Nissen and Stenliden, 2020); and Learning is a social activity; learning in small groups is associated with the better achievement of interpersonal skills and positive attitudes toward the learning environment and thinking skills (Wyness and Dalton, 2018).…”

Effectiveness of simulation-based learning in Malaysian higher education: a case study of MonsoonSIM

“…Having a solid grasp of financial knowledge leads to sound decision-making (Zutter and Smart, 2022). The synergistic combination of SBL with traditional lecture-based instruction in the realm of financial management augments the overall learning outcomes (Alstete and Beutell, 2019).…”

Multiplying success: the power of multiple simulations with graduated weighting and coordinated sequencing for learner engagement

“…These engaging activities improve understanding through virtual experience, skill development and practical decision-making. Simulations are particularly effective in business education and can expose learners to realistic management scenarios and allow them to practice and apply their knowledge and abilities in a safe and controlled environment (Alstete and Beutell, 2019; Alstete and Beutell, 2021). Research has shown that average student engagement levels in business education is higher in simulation and gaming than with traditional course experiences and can produce significantly higher improvements in self-efficacy (Rogmans et al , 2019; Tompson and Dass, 2000).…”