1994
DOI: 10.2307/41165768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Process Reengineering: Improving in New Strategic Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early advocates of BPR touted it as the next revolution in obtaining breakthrough performance via process improvement and process change [17]. Since 1990, different researchers such as Hammer [9], Harrington [18], Klein [19], Davenport [13], Johansson et al [20], and Dixon et al [21] have developed different definitions of BRP. Hammer and Champy [12] defined BPR as a fundamental redesign of organizational processes to create radical improvement in vital areas such as cost, quality, service, and speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early advocates of BPR touted it as the next revolution in obtaining breakthrough performance via process improvement and process change [17]. Since 1990, different researchers such as Hammer [9], Harrington [18], Klein [19], Davenport [13], Johansson et al [20], and Dixon et al [21] have developed different definitions of BRP. Hammer and Champy [12] defined BPR as a fundamental redesign of organizational processes to create radical improvement in vital areas such as cost, quality, service, and speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammer and Champy (1993) define BPR as "the fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvements in critical contemporary measures of performance, such as cost, quality, service, and speed." Johansson et al (1993) provide a description of BPR relative to other process-oriented views, "Business Process Reengineering, although a close relative, seeks radical rather than merely continuous improvement. It escalates the efforts of JIT and TQM to make process orientation a strategic tool and a core competence of the organization.…”
Section: Business Process Reengineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reengineering can be introduced as a difficult and risky process but it is still the best option for the enterprises which want to take the new strategic path, although dangerous by itself (Dixon, Arnold, Heineke, Kim, & Mulligan, 1994;Adeiemi & Aianda, 2008). However, according to Hammer (1995), reengineering brings changes, new ideas, attitudes, new technologies and work organization.…”
Section: Notion Of Reengineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%