Business process improvement methods in healthcare: a comparative study

Abstract

Purpose According to the literature concerned with this study, less than satisfactory outcomes have been achieved through implementing business process improvements methods (BPIMs) in industries, in general, and in healthcare, in particular. The existing methods used need to be enhanced in order to create more effective outcomes. There has also been a lack of studies documenting gaps or shortfalls in implementing BPIMs, to be presented to the BPI research community. Therefore, researchers of this paper have attempted to fill gaps between theory and practice. On the contrary, there is also a need to link practical outcomes in the healthcare domain with those of the BPI research community. The purpose of this paper is to review popular BPIMs, techniques and tools applied in the healthcare domain; it seeks to examine and highlight their significant roles, clarify their pros and cons, and find opportunities to enhance their impact on the achievement of more sustainable improvements in the healthcare domain. Design/methodology/approach This study has been carried out by using a methodology combining an in-depth literature review with a comparison framework, which is called as the “Framework for Comparing Business Process Improvement Methods.” The framework is composed of seven dimensions and has been adapted from four recognized, related frameworks. In addition to the in-depth review of related literature and the adapted comparison framework, researchers have conducted several interviews with healthcare BPI practitioners in different hospitals, to attain their opinions of BPI methods and tools used in their practices. Findings The main results have indicated that significant improvements have been achieved by implementing BPIMs in the healthcare domain according to related literature. However, there were some shortfalls in the existing methods that need to be resolved. The most important of these has been the shortfall in representing and analyzing targeted domain knowledge during improvement phases. The tool currently used for representing the domain, specifically flowcharts, is very abstract and does not present the domain in a clear form. The flowchart tool also fails to clearly present the separation of concerns between business processes and the information systems processes that support a business in a given domain. Practical implications The findings of this study can be useful for BPI practitioners and researchers, mainly within the healthcare domain. The findings can help these groups to understand BPIMs shortfalls and encourage them to consider how BPIMs can be potentially improved. Originality/value This researchers of this paper have proposed a comparison framework for highlighting popular BPIMs in the healthcare domain, along with their uses and shortfalls. In addition, they have conducted a deep literature review based on the practical results obtained from different healthcare institutions implementing unique BPIMs around the world. There has also been valuable interview feedback attained from BPI leaders of specific hospitals in Saudi Arabia. This combination is expected to contribute to knowledge of BPIMs from both theoretical and practical points of view.

Assessing the Impact of Lean Healthcare on Inpatient Care: A Systematic Review

“…This importance has been pointed out by other studies [134,[161][162][163][164]. Other common tools include standard work, i.e., a concept whereby each work activity is precisely described with a specific cycle time, task sequence, and other steps involved within the process [95], and is considered a prerequisite for flow [10]; the 5'S program, which is used to eliminate clutter [165] and enhance the standardization of stock, as well as to systematically organize the unit and streamline the documentation processes [97]; cause and effect analyses, which are used to map the possible causes of a problem into categories [90,166]; and Kaizen, which is a philosophy of continuous incremental improvement over time and space [29,99,104]. These findings are similar with those reported in previous studies [44,62,161], and sustain the assertion that most LH interventions focus more on tools related to assessment and improvement and less on processes-monitoring tools.…”

Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital – The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center

“…The hospital aimed to increase the IV-tPA administration rate and Endovascular Therapy (EVT) rate (transfers to another hospital) by reducing the Door-to-CT and Door-to-Needle lead time activities. Recently, Ahmed et al (2019) noted that Six Sigma, Lean and Lean Six Sigma are among the most commonly used methodologies for improvement in healthcare. In the BPMC case, the decision to combine lean and six sigma is consistent with the modern research direction to combine more quality improvement methods to create stronger and more sustainable results (Ahmed et al, 2019).…”

“…For instance, Bhat and Jnanesh (2014) demonstrated that the LSS implementation in a rural hospital in India produced a reduction in cycle time of out-patient department services. Similarly Ahmed et al (2019) pointed out that LSS and workforce management have a significant impact on quality performance of the Malaysian hospitals. Concerning the six sigma, Prajapati and Suman (2019) presented a successful application aimed to reduce the length of stay for neonatal jaundice patients in an Indian rural hospital.…”

Optimasi Business Process Improvement Berbantuan Metode FLASH dengan Integrasi API Trello

“…Business Process Improvement (BPI) sangat erat kaitannya dengan perbaikan pada pengelolaan aktivitas atau proyek untuk mendapatkan hasil yang lebih optimal. Pengelolaan aktivitas atau proyek yang baik pada lingkungan bisnis merupakan suatu hal yang penting karena hal ini dapat meningkatkan tingkat keberhasilan aktivitas/proyek dan memberikan jaminan yang lebih besar kepada stakeholder terkait dengan pengelolaan sumber daya secara efektif [1][2] [3]. Pada Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) Vol.…”