Business Process Engineering Study Edition

Scheer, August-Wilhelm

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03615-0

Cited by 15 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…From the customer perspective, RMs provide information about package processes and best practices that is helpful when comparing package capabilities and determining positive or negative issues at the implementation phase (Scheer and Habermann, 2000). RMs have the following characteristics (Fettke and Loos, 2003; Albani et al , 2007; Kirchmer, 2011; Scheer, 1998): reflect and exhibit the best practices provided by businesses or industrial sectors, characterized by universal applicability, which means they describe domains, rather than a specific enterprise, and recognize reusability, which means the ease of adaptation to specific situations and assistance with developing information systems.…”

Section: Preliminariesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study and evaluation of ERP reference models in the context of ERP IT-driven implementation

Al-Sabri

Al‐Mashari

Chikh

2018

BPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider the question of what is an appropriate enterprise resource planning (ERP) reference model for specifying areas of change in the context of IT-driven ERP implementation and through the model matching. There are other implicit goals to increasing the awareness of the reference models, as this highlights the principles embedded in ERP systems and explains the classification of reference models, which is useful in terms of the reuse of knowledge. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a comparison between ERP reference models is conducted using a suitable decision-making technique and the final results are discussed. The comparison depends on nine criteria related to conceptual ERP reference models: scope, abstraction, granularity, views, purpose, simplicity, availability, ease of use for model matching, and target audience. Findings This study concludes that the business process reference model is best for specifying areas of change in the context of IT-driven ERP implementations. The final ranking of the alternatives based on all criteria places the system organizational model second, followed by the function and data/object reference models, in that order. Originality/value This paper is one of very few studies on the selection of appropriate ERP reference models according to the ERP implementation approach and model matching factors. This research also provides an in-depth analysis of various ERP reference model types.

show abstract

Section: Preliminariesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study and evaluation of ERP reference models in the context of ERP IT-driven implementation

Al-Sabri

Al‐Mashari

Chikh

2018

BPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this context reference models may contribute. A well-known example of such reference models are Event Driven Process chains (EPC's) which have been developed in a collaborative research project conducted by SAP AG and the IDS Scheer AG [21,35] and which form the basis of the SAP R/3 reference models [10]. Also other enterprise information systems make use of similar reference models, e.g.…”

Section: Alternative Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mining configurable enterprise information systems

Jansen-Vullers

Aalst

Rosemann

2006

Data & Knowledge Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Process mining is the extraction of a process model from system logs. These logs have to meet minimum requirements, i.e. each event should refer to a case and a task. Many system logs do not meet these requirements, and therefore it is not possible to use process mining for process optimization or delta analysis. This paper shows an alternative process mining procedure for logs containing data on the frequency that process steps have been executed. To be able to mine such logs we apply Configurable Event-driven Process Chains (C-EPCs). If a C-EPC is available, we propose a method to mine the process. If only a classical reference model (i.e. an EPC) is available, we propose a method to first derive the C-EPC through mining and then analyse the process. This approach enables us to do process mining in the context of ERP systems such as SAP R/3.

show abstract

“…Varias propuestas se han presentado en diferentes dominios para la representación de la variabilidad en el espacio. En el dominio de las industrias de manufactura varias propuestas recurren al concepto de familia de productos [4,5,6,7,8] para gestionar más eficientemente la variabilidad. En tanto, en la industria del software es muy utilizado el modelo de características (FM-Feature Model) y el modelo de variabilidad ortogonal (OVM) [3], entre otras.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Una ontología para la gestión de versiones de familias de producto

Sonzini¹,

Vegetti²,

Leone³

2015

Relainep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen. La gestión del ciclo de vida de producto (PLM -Product Lifecycle Management) requiere un conjunto de soluciones para representar e integrar la información de una familia de producto. Las soluciones deben considerar los cambios en los requerimientos de los usuarios y del dominio, los cuales pueden ocurrir por diversas causas. Cada cambio modifica la información de producto, generando una nueva versión del mismo. Por lo tanto, la propuesta de este trabajo tiene por objetivo introducir un enfoque basado en ontologías para la gestión de versiones de información de familia de productos a lo largo de su ciclo de vida. Esta propuesta plantea conceptos generales para la captura y representación de los cambios, independientemente del modelo de productos utilizado para la representación de estas familias. Asimismo, se presenta la aplicación del modelo propuesto en dos modelos de productos diferentes: la ontología de productos PRONTO (PRoduct ONTOlogy) y el modelo de características (FM -Feature Model).Palabras Clave: Versión de Producto, Variabilidad, Ontología, Familia de Productos, PRONTO, Product Lifecycle Management, Feature Model. IntroducciónLa administración del ciclo de vida de producto (PLM) es una actividad eficiente para gestionar toda la información relacionada con un producto desde su inicio, desarrollo, madurez, hasta su final [1]. Es importante gestionar la información de los productos en todas las fases de su vida debido a que un simple cambio en el mismo durante una determinada fase podría propagarse y afectar la consistencia e integridad de la información en el resto de las fases. Los sistemas PLM requieren soluciones robustas para representar de forma consistente los modelos de datos de producto y así poder intercambiarlos con otras organizaciones, stakeholders, procesos, etapas en el ciclo de vida.En muchos casos es necesario que un producto cambie con el propósito de dar soporte a diferentes segmentos del mercado, adoptar nuevas tecnologías, mejorar una 3º Simposio Argentino de Informatica Industrial, SII 2014 43

show abstract

Business Process Engineering Study Edition

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant proteclive laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Cited by 15 publications

References 0 publications

A comparative study and evaluation of ERP reference models in the context of ERP IT-driven implementation

A comparative study and evaluation of ERP reference models in the context of ERP IT-driven implementation

Mining configurable enterprise information systems

Una ontología para la gestión de versiones de familias de producto

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About