2018 Electrical Power Distribution Conference (EPDC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/epdc.2018.8536279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business Prioritization in Electric Distribution Network Using Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study for Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the calculation results of the investment scale model proposed in the previous section, the weight of each index is calculated by the analytic hierarchy process and grey correlation method, and the obtained index weight is calculated by the linear weighted average method [9]. Finally, the weight of investment strategy evaluation index is calculated, as shown in Figure (5). The comprehensive evaluation method summarizes all indicators to obtain the comprehensive score, and calculates the comprehensive score of the investment scale model of each characteristic industry, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Investment Strategy Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the calculation results of the investment scale model proposed in the previous section, the weight of each index is calculated by the analytic hierarchy process and grey correlation method, and the obtained index weight is calculated by the linear weighted average method [9]. Finally, the weight of investment strategy evaluation index is calculated, as shown in Figure (5). The comprehensive evaluation method summarizes all indicators to obtain the comprehensive score, and calculates the comprehensive score of the investment scale model of each characteristic industry, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Investment Strategy Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytic hierarchy process [5] refers to taking a complex multi-objective decision-making problem as a system and decomposing the objectives into multiple objectives or criteria. It is then decomposed into several levels of multiple indicators (or criteria and constraints), and the single hierarchical ranking (weight) and total ranking are calculated by the fuzzy quantitative method of qualitative indicators (multi-index) and multi-scheme optimization decision-making system method.…”
Section: Determination Of Subjective Index Weight By Analytic Hierarc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, RI is the index value of degree of freedom, and the value of RI changes according to the dimension, specific values are shown in reference [32].…”
Section: D) Hierarchical Single Ranking and Consistency Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this paper proposes an adaptive policy-adjusted crossover operator and variational operator as shown in Eqs (31). and(32). The crossover probabilities nonlinearly using trigonometric functions based on the fitness function values of individuals during population iteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%